Christianity, Part 5

Posted on January 2, 2023 by admin

There are 6 more occurrences of πάντας in Luke’s Gospel [see Table], the Greek word translated all people in: And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people (πάντας, a form of πᾶς) to myself.¹ I’ll consider these in detail.

There were some present at that very time who told [Jesus] about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices. And he answered them, “Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all (πάντας, a form of πᾶς) the other Galileans, because they suffered in this way? No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all (πάντες, another form of πᾶς) likewise perish. Or those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them: do you think that they were worse offenders than all (πάντας, a form of πᾶς) the others who lived in Jerusalem? No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all (πάντες, another form of πᾶς) likewise perish” [Table].²

The first occurrence of πάντας was limited by the other Galileans. The next was limited by the others who lived in Jerusalem at the time that the tower in Siloam fell. Both occurrences of πάντες were limited by ἐὰν μὴ (unless) μετανοῆτε (you repent). These are four examples of how Jesus’ used two forms of πᾶς (πάντας and πάντες) when He intended to limit them.

I’ll take a few moments to consider whether the necessity of repentance raises any objection to Jesus’ promise: And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people (πάντας, a form of πᾶς) to myself.³ I have not come to call the righteous, Jesus said, but sinners to repentance (μετάνοιαν, a form of μετάνοια).⁴ This is one way Jesus understood his mission to save the world. After his resurrection He reiterated this aspect of his mission (Luke 24:44-47 ESV):

“These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled” [Table]. Then he opened their minds to understand the Scriptures, and said to them, “Thus it is written, that the Christ should suffer and on the third day rise from the dead, and that repentance (μετάνοιαν, a form of μετάνοια) for the forgiveness of sins should be proclaimed in his name to all⁵ nations, beginning from Jerusalem” [Table].

Peter and the apostles⁶ also proclaimed this message about Jesus’ mission when questioned by the high priest (Acts 5:30, 31 ESV):

The God of our fathers raised Jesus, whom you killed by hanging him on a tree. God exalted him at his right hand as Leader and Savior, to give (δοῦναι, a form of δίδωμι) repentance (μετάνοιαν, a form of μετάνοια) to Israel and forgiveness of sins [Table].

When the circumcision party [in Jerusalem] criticized [Peter], saying [Table], “You went to uncircumcised men and ate with them,”⁷ Peter explained (Acts 11:15-18 ESV):

As I began to speak, the Holy Spirit fell on them just as on us at the beginning. And I remembered the word of the Lord, how he said, ‘John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit.’ If then God gave the same gift to them as he gave to us when we believed in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I that I could stand in God’s way?” When they heard these things they fell silent. And they glorified God, saying, “Then to the Gentiles also God has granted (ἔδωκεν, another form of δίδωμι) repentance (μετάνοιαν. a form of μετάνοια) that leads to life” [Table].

Paul instructed Timothy (2 Timothy 2:22-26 ESV):

So flee youthful passions and pursue righteousness, faith, love, and peace, along with those who call on the Lord from a pure heart. Have nothing to do with foolish, ignorant controversies; you know that they breed quarrels. And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but⁸ kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, correcting his opponents with gentleness.⁹ God may perhaps grant¹⁰ them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth, and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, after being captured by him to do his will.

Translating τοὺς ἀντιδιατιθεμένους his opponents (ESV) or opponents (NET) misses a beautiful nuance the translators of the KJV captured better with those that oppose themselves. The Greek word ἀντιδιατιθεμένους is a participle of the verb ἀντιδιατίθημι in the middle/passive voice.

The Greek middle voice shows the subject acting in his own interest or on his own behalf, or participating in the results of the verbal action. In overly simplistic terms, sometimes the middle form of the verb could be translated as “the performer of the action actually acting upon himself” (reflexive action).¹¹

While τοὺς ἀντιδιατιθεμένους may “be opposed” to Timothy’s teaching about Jesus Christ, to be opponents or his opponents should probably be reserved for the active voice.

Grammatical voice indicates whether the subject is the performer of the action of the verb (active voice), or the subject is the recipient of the action (passive voice). If the subject of the sentence is executing the action, then the verb is referred to as being in the active voice.¹²

Here is the beautiful part: Saul was ravaging the church, and entering house after house, he dragged off men and women and committed them to prison.¹³ When Paul recounted Saul’s encounter with the resurrected, ascended and glorified Christ, he quoted Jesus’ words: Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me? It is hard for you to kick against the goads.¹⁴ The ESV translation of σκληρόν σοι, It is hard for you, is virtually identical to the KJV, it is hard for thee. It is hard for us, good church folk, not to hear Jesus’ judge Saul for harming other good church folk. But σοι is in the dative case, so “hard to you” is probably the most literal translation.

The translators of NET caught the flavor of Paul’s recollection of Jesus’ words σκληρόν σοι better: You are hurting yourself. Jesus knows the relentless power of drawing all to Himself. He would never encourage anyone to hold out for a personal appearance. That’s not the point of the story. Rather, pay more attention to the goads as they happen. And by all means, don’t avoid the Bible or Bible teaching, especially when you know that the goads come more frequently then.

At any rate, it makes sense to me that Paul, born anew (ἄνωθεν) from Saul’s encounter with the glorified Christ, wrote τοὺς ἀντιδιατιθεμένους to Timothy, and understood these words as, those that oppose themselves. What was more difficult to wrap my head around was, God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth…¹⁵ That didn’t seem to carry any consciousness of Jesus’ promise to draw all to Himself.

The Greek word translated perhaps was μήποτε. The word translated may…grant was δῴη in the NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸, or δω in the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text. Both are forms of δίδωμι: “to give (something) to (someone); to deliver and provide; to grant, bestow, impart.” The verb δω is in the subjunctive mood, but δῴη is in the optative mood.

The optative is the mood of possibility, removed even further than the subjunctive mood from something conceived of as actual. Often it is used to convey a wish or hope for a certain action to occur.¹⁶

Either way, this is not an artifact of translating a verb in the subjunctive mood in a result clause into English. In fact, Paul seems to have gone out of his way to ensure that God granting repentance to those that oppose themselves is not the result of Timothy’s kindness to everyone (πάντας), his ability to teach, his patient enduring of evil, nor correcting his opponents with gentleness. Rather, it is God’s kindness [that] leads you to repentance.¹⁷

The Greek word translated leads above was ἄγει an active form of ἄγω in the present tense and indicative mood:

The indicative mood is a statement of fact or an actual occurrence from the writer’s or speaker’s perspective…It may be action occurring in past, present, or future time.¹⁸

[D]o you have contempt for the wealth of his kindness, forbearance, and patience, Paul asked those who judge others, and yet do not know that God’s kindness leads you to repentance (μετάνοιαν, a form of μετάνοια)?¹⁹ The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, Peter wrote, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance (μετάνοιαν, a form of μετάνοια).²⁰ Repentance, too, seems to be part of Jesus drawing all to Himself rather than an objection to it.

The next occurrence of πάντας follows (Luke 13:28 ESV):

In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when you see Abraham and Isaac and Jacob and all (πάντας, a form of πᾶς) the prophets in the kingdom of God but you yourselves cast out.

Here Jesus limited πάντας by the prophets (τοὺς προφήτας), but I can’t just brush this verse aside without considering the whole passage (Luke 13:22-30 ESV):

[Jesus] went on his way through towns and villages, teaching and journeying toward Jerusalem.²¹ And someone said to him, “Lord, will those who are saved be few?” And he said to them, “Strive to enter through the narrow door.²² For many, I tell you, will seek to enter and will not be able. When once the master of the house has risen and shut the door, and you begin to stand outside and to knock at the door, saying, ‘Lord,²³ open to us,’ then he will answer you, ‘I do not know where you come from.’ Then you will begin to say, ‘We ate and drank in your presence, and you taught in our streets.’ But he will say, ‘I tell you, I do not know where you come from. Depart from me, all you workers²⁴ of evil!’²⁵ In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when you see Abraham and Isaac and Jacob and all the prophets in the kingdom of God but you yourselves cast out. And people will come from east and west, and from north and south, and recline at table in the kingdom of God. And behold, some are last who will be first, and some are first who will be last.”

And someone said to Jesus, κύριε, εἰ ὀλίγοι οἱ σῳζόμενοι. The most literal understanding I can arrive at is: “Lord, if few the saved.” Since Jesus’ answer included not only πολλοί (a form of πολύς) but ἰσχύσουσιν (a form of ἰσχύω), it seems remotely possible the question was whether the saved were puny or weak. But that doesn’t mitigate the fear engendered by this answer.

The participle σῳζόμενοι used as an adjective here might alleviate some of that fear, however, since it is in the present tense. If this were a divine command, I would probably take the present tense in a now and forever sort of way. In a question from the mouth of a human being I feel fairly secure limiting the scope of the present tense to the questioner’s moment in time.

Strive to enter through the narrow door, Jesus’ answer began: ἀγωνίζεσθε εἰσελθεῖν διὰ τῆς στενῆς θύρας [or, πυλης]. The Greek word ἀγωνίζεσθε (a form of ἀγωνίζομαι) means: “to compete for a prize; to engage in battle; to struggle; to fight; to labour fervently; to strive; to exert; to accomplish.” It is an imperative from Jesus’ lips in the present tense, which I do tend to take in a now and forever sort of way. But it doesn’t have quite the same ring as, “Believe in the Lord Jesus,²⁶ and you will be saved, you and your household.”²⁷

For many…will seek to enter and will not be able, Jesus continued: ὅτι πολλοί…ζητήσουσιν εἰσελθεῖν καὶ οὐκ ἰσχύσουσιν. The Greek paints a fairly vivid word picture of a crowd of people doing whatever to one another to stampede through a narrow opening. For many…οὐκ ἰσχύσουσιν (a form of ἰσχύω), will not “have power, be competent, be able; be successful; be capable, confident; be in possession of one’s powers, be in good health; be strong, be mighty; make strenuous efforts, endeavour; have meaning, be valid; be strong (physically), have power, prevail, have strength.”

To make matters worse, the clock is ticking: When once the master of the house has risen and shut the door… This reminds me of the proverb, “I don’t have to outrun the bear, I just have to outrun you.”²⁸ I should point out that door (θύραν, a form of θύρα) here is a different word from the narrow door/strait gate (πυλης, a form of πύλη) through which people are crowding in the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text. The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had θύρας (another form of θύρα) for the narrow door through which Jesus commanded these people to enter.

So, when I consider that the master of the house rises to shut this narrow door at some point in time, I should also be mindful of the possibility that Jesus had a different door in mind. The NA²⁷ is essentially equivalent²⁹ to the NET parallel Greek text. In 2 Timothy 2:24 (footnote 8), for instance, the word but was ἀλλὰ in the NET parallel Greek text (NA²⁷) and ἀλλ’ in NA²⁸, the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text. That means to me that the editors of NA²⁷ agreed that ἀλλὰ was more original. Later, in NA²⁸ the editors reverted back to ἀλλ’ in agreement once again with most of the received texts.

The difference between ἀλλὰ and ἀλλ’ is insignificant. Both translate but. The difference between θύραν and πυλης might be significant and might not. Could Jesus use two different words that mean door to refer to the same door? Sure. If He used two different words could He have meant two different doors? Sure. The agreement of the texts of NA²⁷ and NA²⁸ means that two groups of editors agreed that θύρας was more original for the narrow door, and that Jesus used the same root word (θύρα) for the shut door. But that doesn’t say anything about what the editors of NA²⁹ might decide. So, I try to keep an open mind.

I’ll pick this up in another essay. Tables comparing the Greek of 2 Timothy 2:24, 25; Luke 13:22; 13:24, 25; 13:27 and Acts 16:31 in the NET and KJV follow.

2 Timothy 2:24, 25 (NET)	2 Timothy 2:24, 25 (KJV)
And the Lord’s slave must not engage in heated disputes but be kind toward all, an apt teacher, patient,	And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient,

2 Timothy 2:24 (NET Parallel Greek)	2 Timothy 2:24 (Stephanus Textus Receptus)	2 Timothy 2:24 (Byzantine Majority Text)
δοῦλον δὲ κυρίου οὐ δεῖ μάχεσθαι ἀλλὰ ἤπιον εἶναι πρὸς πάντας, διδακτικόν, ἀνεξίκακον	δουλον δε κυριου ου δει μαχεσθαι αλλ ηπιον ειναι προς παντας διδακτικον ανεξικακον	δουλον δε κυριου ου δει μαχεσθαι αλλ ηπιον ειναι προς παντας διδακτικον ανεξικακον

correcting opponents with gentleness. Perhaps God will grant them repentance and then knowledge of the truth,

In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;

2 Timothy 2:25 (NET Parallel Greek)	2 Timothy 2:25 (Stephanus Textus Receptus)	2 Timothy 2:25 (Byzantine Majority Text)
ἐν πραΰτητι παιδεύοντα τοὺς ἀντιδιατιθεμένους, μήποτε δῴη αὐτοῖς ὁ θεὸς μετάνοιαν εἰς ἐπίγνωσιν ἀληθείας	εν πραοτητι παιδευοντα τους αντιδιατιθεμενους μηποτε δω αυτοις ο θεος μετανοιαν εις επιγνωσιν αληθειας	εν πραοτητι παιδευοντα τους αντιδιατιθεμενους μηποτε δω αυτοις ο θεος μετανοιαν εις επιγνωσιν αληθειας

Luke 13:22 (NET)	Luke 13:22 (KJV)
Then Jesus traveled throughout towns and villages, teaching and making his way toward Jerusalem.	And he went through the cities and villages, teaching, and journeying toward Jerusalem.

Luke 13:22 (NET Parallel Greek)	Luke 13:22 (Stephanus Textus Receptus)	Luke 13:22 (Byzantine Majority Text)
Καὶ διεπορεύετο κατὰ πόλεις καὶ κώμας διδάσκων καὶ πορείαν ποιούμενος εἰς Ἱεροσόλυμα	και διεπορευετο κατα πολεις και κωμας διδασκων και πορειαν ποιουμενος εις ιερουσαλημ	και διεπορευετο κατα πολεις και κωμας διδασκων και πορειαν ποιουμενος εις ιερουσαλημ

Luke 13:24, 25 (NET)	Luke 13:24, 25 (KJV)
“Exert every effort to enter through the narrow door because many, I tell you, will try to enter and will not be able to.	Strive to enter in at the strait gate: for many, I say unto you, will seek to enter in, and shall not be able.

Luke 13:24 (NET Parallel Greek)	Luke 13:24 (Stephanus Textus Receptus)	Luke 13:24 (Byzantine Majority Text)
ἀγωνίζεσθε εἰσελθεῖν διὰ τῆς στενῆς θύρας, ὅτι πολλοί, λέγω ὑμῖν, ζητήσουσιν εἰσελθεῖν καὶ οὐκ ἰσχύσουσιν	αγωνιζεσθε εισελθειν δια της στενης πυλης οτι πολλοι λεγω υμιν ζητησουσιν εισελθειν και ουκ ισχυσουσιν	αγωνιζεσθε εισελθειν δια της στενης πυλης οτι πολλοι λεγω υμιν ζητησουσιν εισελθειν και ουκ ισχυσουσιν

Once the head of the house gets up and shuts the door, then you will stand outside and start to knock on the door and beg him, ‘Lord, let us in!’ But he will answer you, ‘I don’t know where you come from.’

When once the master of the house is risen up, and hath shut to the door, and ye begin to stand without, and to knock at the door, saying, Lord, Lord, open unto us; and he shall answer and say unto you, I know you not whence ye are:

Luke 13:25 (NET Parallel Greek)	Luke 13:25 (Stephanus Textus Receptus)	Luke 13:25 (Byzantine Majority Text)
ἀφ᾿ οὗ ἂν ἐγερθῇ ὁ οἰκοδεσπότης καὶ ἀποκλείσῃ τὴν θύραν καὶ ἄρξησθε ἔξω ἑστάναι καὶ κρούειν τὴν θύραν λέγοντες· κύριε, ἄνοιξον ἡμῖν, καὶ ἀποκριθεὶς ἐρεῖ ὑμῖν· οὐκ οἶδα ὑμᾶς πόθεν ἐστέ	αφ ου αν εγερθη ο οικοδεσποτης και αποκλειση την θυραν και αρξησθε εξω εσταναι και κρουειν την θυραν λεγοντες κυριε κυριε ανοιξον ημιν και αποκριθεις ερει υμιν ουκ οιδα υμας ποθεν εστε	αφ ου αν εγερθη ο οικοδεσποτης και αποκλειση την θυραν και αρξησθε εξω εσταναι και κρουειν την θυραν λεγοντες κυριε κυριε ανοιξον ημιν και αποκριθεις ερει υμιν ουκ οιδα υμας ποθεν εστε

Luke 13:27 (NET)	Luke 13:27 (KJV)
But he will reply, ‘I don’t know where you come from! Go away from me, all you evildoers!’	But he shall say, I tell you, I know you not whence ye are; depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity.

Luke 13:27 (NET Parallel Greek)	Luke 13:27 (Stephanus Textus Receptus)	Luke 13:27 (Byzantine Majority Text)
καὶ ἐρεῖ λέγων ὑμῖν· οὐκ οἶδα [ὑμᾶς] πόθεν ἐστέ· ἀπόστητε ἀπ᾿ ἐμοῦ πάντες ἐργάται ἀδικίας	και ερει λεγω υμιν ουκ οιδα υμας ποθεν εστε αποστητε απ εμου παντες οι εργαται της αδικιας	και ερει λεγω υμιν ουκ οιδα υμας ποθεν εστε αποστητε απ εμου παντες οι εργαται της αδικιας

Acts 16:31 (NET)	Acts 16:31 (KJV)
They replied, “Believe in the Lord Jesus and you will be saved, you and your household.”	And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.

Acts 16:31 (NET Parallel Greek)	Acts 16:31 (Stephanus Textus Receptus)	Acts 16:31 (Byzantine Majority Text)
οἱ δὲ εἶπαν· πίστευσον ἐπὶ τὸν κύριον Ἰησοῦν καὶ σωθήσῃ σὺ καὶ ὁ οἶκος σου	οι δε ειπον πιστευσον επι τον κυριον ιησουν χριστον και σωθηση συ και ο οικος σου	οι δε ειπον πιστευσον επι τον κυριον ιησουν χριστον και σωθηση συ και ο οικος σου

Christianity, Part 6

Back to Christianity, Part 7

Back to Christianity, Part 8

Back to Who Am I? Part 16

Back to Who Am I? Part 17

¹ John 12:32 (ESV)

² Luke 13:1-5 (ESV)

³ John 12:32 (ESV)

⁴ Luke 5:32 (ESV)

⁵ Here πάντα, (another form of πᾶς) was limited by τὰ ἔθνη (ESV: nations), if one wants to consider that a limitation.

⁶ Acts 5:29 (ESV) Table

⁷ Acts 11:2b, 3 (ESV)

⁸ The NET parallel Greek text had ἀλλὰ here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus, Byzantine Majority Text and NA²⁸ had ἀλλ’.

⁹ The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had πραΰτητι here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had πραοτητι (KJV: meekness).

¹⁰ The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had δῴη here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had δω (KJV: will grant).

¹¹ Grammatical Voice of Verbs, Greek Verbs (Shorter Definitions), Resources for Learning New Testament Greek

¹² Ibid.

¹³ Acts 8:3 (ESV)

¹⁴ Acts 26:14b (ESV) Table

¹⁵ 2 Timothy 2:25b (NET)

¹⁶ Verbal Moods, Greek Verbs (Shorter Definitions), Resources for Learning New Testament Greek

¹⁷ Romans 2:4b (NET)

¹⁸ Verbal Moods, Greek Verbs (Shorter Definitions), Resources for Learning New Testament Greek

¹⁹ Romans 2:4 (NET)

²⁰ 2 Peter 3:9 (ESV) Table

²¹ In the NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ Jerusalem was spelled Ἱεροσόλυμα, and ιερουσαλημ in the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text.

²² The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had θύρας here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had πυλης (KJV: gate).

²³ The Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had κυριε κυριε (KJV: Lord, Lord) here, where the NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had simply κυριε.

²⁴ The Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had οι preceding workers (NET: –doers). The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ did not.

²⁵ The Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had the article της preceding evil (KJV: iniquity). The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ did not.

²⁶ The Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had χριστον (KJV: Christ) here. The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ did not.

²⁷ Acts 16:31 (ESV)

²⁸ From the “Meaning Behind The Proverb ‘I Don’t Have to Outrun The Bear’” on The USC Digital Folklore Archives: “So, the story goes like this. Two men are hiking in the woods, and they see a bear. The bear is really mad, so they start running to get away. The first man says ‘how are we going to outrun this bear?’ and the other guy goes ‘I don’t have to outrun the bear, I just have to outrun you.’”

²⁹ From the Preface to the NET Bible online: Another major change introduced with the Second Beta Edition of the NET Bible was a significant update to the text-critical notes for the New Testament. After the printing of the First Beta Edition, it was suggested to the NET Bible team by the German Bible Society (Deutsche Bibelgesellchaft) in Stuttgart, Germany, that the information in the New Testament tc notes should be standardized to the Nestle-Aland 27th edition text which they publish in conjunction with the Institut für neutestamentliche Textforschung in Münster, Germany. (Prior to this point, the textual evidence in the tc notes had been drawn from NA27, UBS4, and other sources.)

Westworld, Part 3

Posted on November 1, 2021 by admin

“What is a person but a collection of choices?” the Man in Black (Ed Harris) asks rhetorically. “Where do those choices come from? Do I have a choice? Were any of these choices ever truly mine to begin with?”^[1]

The Man in Black had cut himself off from the guidebook for the real world, the knowledge of God revealed in the Bible. He did not believe all that [God] had made…was very good.^[2] He did not believe what happened to humankind when the first people rejected God’s word for the serpent’s (Genesis 3:1-7 NET).

Now the serpent was shrewder than any of the wild animals that the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Is it really true that God said, ‘You must not eat from any tree of the orchard’?” [Table] The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit from the trees of the orchard; but concerning the fruit of the tree that is in the middle of the orchard God said, ‘You must not eat from it, and you must not touch it, or else you will die.’” The serpent said to the woman, “Surely you will not die [Table], for God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will open and you will be like God, knowing good and evil” [Table]. When the woman saw that the tree produced fruit that was good for food, was attractive to the eye, and was desirable for making one wise, she took some of its fruit and ate it. She also gave some of it to her husband who was with her, and he ate it. Then the eyes of both of them opened, and they knew they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves [Table].

[S]in entered the world through one man, Paul explained, and death through sin, and so death spread to all people because all sinned.^[3] Jesus said to those Judeans who had believed him,^[4] You people are from your father the devil, and you want to do what your father desires.^[5] Granted, it’s all too easy for Gentiles to believe that Jews are from [their] father the devil. It takes us a little longer to realize that Jews are Everyman in the Gospel narratives.

The Man in Black despite cutting himself off from the knowledge of God revealed in the Bible recognized the effect of being from his father the devil. His wife Juliet (Sela Ward) asked him to tell her one true thing. Thinking she was passed out drunk, he confessed:

No one else sees it: this thing in me. Even I didn’t see it at first. And then one day, it was there: a stain I had never noticed before, tiny fleck of darkness…invisible to everyone. Yet, I could see nothing else, ‘til finally I understood that the darkness wasn’t some mark from something I’d done, or some regrettable decision I’d made. I was shedding my skin. The darkness was what was underneath. It was mine all along. And I decided how much of it I let into the world. I tried to do right. I was faithful, generous…kind, at least in this world. That has to count for something, right?^[6]

The Man in Black didn’t believe that [w]e are all like one who is unclean, all our so-called righteous acts are like a menstrual rag in [God’s] sight.^[7] The Man in Black didn’t believe God. And so a confession that may seem like the prelude to receiving God’s salvation through Jesus Christ turns hollow and bitter as he fulfills the rest of Isaiah’s prophecy (Isaiah 64:6b, 7 NET):

We all wither like a leaf; our sins carry us away like the wind. No one invokes your name, or makes an effort to take hold of you. For you have rejected us and handed us over to our own sins [Table].

The Man in Black’s confession to his wife continued:

I built a wall and tried to protect you and Emily. But you saw right through it, didn’t you? You’re the only one. And for that I am truly sorry. Because…everything you feel is true. I don’t belong to you or this world. I belong to another world. I always have.^[8]

He refers here to Westworld. What follows is a spoiler for the first season. The “gee whiz” factor of this particular plot twist is far outweighed in my opinion by the benefit of having a temporal landmark to recognize the first season’s double helix story arc: The Man in Black (Ed Harris) is William (Jimmi Simpson) older.

He explains to Dolores (Evan Rachel Wood):

Black William: Remember, you’re the one who said this is the only world that matters, and you were right. So, I took your advice and I bought this world.

Dolores: This world doesn’t belong to you.

Black William: Oh, but it does by a majority share. And business is booming. And you wanna know why? Because this place feels more real than the real world.^[9]

I don’t mean to imply that a fictional character was influenced by the devil. It was the true-to-life crafting of this character (among others) as written and acted that caught my attention in the first place, how well his words and actions displayed the same inner turmoil revealed in the Bible.

“I’m a god,” Black William (Ed Harris) tells Teddy (James Marsden), “titan of industry, philanthropist, family man, married to a beautiful woman, father to a beautiful daughter. I’m the good guy…”

Teddy: Did you hurt them, too?

Black William: Never. They never saw anything like the man I am in here. But she knew anyway. She said if I stacked up all my good deeds, it was just an elegant wall I built to hide what’s inside from everyone, and from myself.^[10]

William oversaw the implementation of a program to use the technology of Westworld to create a sinister imitation of eternal life for his dead Father-in-law Jim (Peter Mullan), a virtual immortality that leaves the sin nature “alive” and fully functioning, cynically called “fidelity.” But the android facsimiles of Jim all went insane eventually. Black William explains to his latest facsimile:

Another year or two, they might crack it, get a version of you that’s viable long-term. But the thing is, we’re not so sure anymore. I’m beginning to think that this whole enterprise was a mistake. People aren’t meant to live forever….World is better off without you, Jim. Possibly without me….Now, took me a long time to learn this, but some men are better off dead.^[11]

It struck me how close and how far William was from the truth. For through the law I died to the law so that I may live to God, Paul wrote to believing Galatians. I have been crucified with Christ, and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me. So the life I now live in the body, I live because of the faithfulness of the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.^[12]

Paul didn’t think of this blessing as something exclusively for him alone. He explained in some detail how all men and women are “better off dead” to sin (Romans 6:1-7 NET):

What shall we say then? Are we to remain in sin so that grace may increase? [Table] Absolutely not! How can we who died to sin still live in it? Or do you not know that as many as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? Therefore we have been buried with him through baptism into death, in order that just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we too may live a new life.

For if we have become united with him in the likeness of his death, we will certainly also be united in the likeness of his resurrection. We know that our old man was crucified with him so that the body of sin would no longer dominate us, so that we would no longer be enslaved to sin. (For someone who has died has been freed from sin.)

None of this meant anything to Black William. He was obsessed with his own creation. Though he claims that Westworld “feels more real than the real world,” he also acknowledges to Dolores that “it isn’t because you can’t really fight back and the guests can’t really lose, which means all this is a lie. But we can make it true. Don’t you want that, Dolores, one true thing?”^[13]

The devil isn’t the only one impacting people’s choices in the real world. And perhaps I should make it explicit that I mean the real world, not the fictional “real world” of Westworld (John 3:16-18 NET).

For this is the way God loved the world: He gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world should be saved through him [Table]. The one who believes in him is not condemned. The one who does not believe has been condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the one and only Son of God.

True to form I misunderstood Jesus’ words translated into English. I thought the way God loved the world was to send his one and only Son to be the ultimate Shibboleth of eternal consequence (Judges 12:5, 6 NET):

The Gileadites captured the fords of the Jordan River opposite Ephraim. Whenever an Ephraimite fugitive said, “Let me cross over,” the men of Gilead asked him, “Are you an Ephraimite?” If he said, “No,” then they said to him, “Say ‘Shibboleth!’” If he said, “Sibboleth” (and could not pronounce the word correctly), they grabbed him and executed him right there at the fords of the Jordan. On that day 42,000 Ephraimites fell dead.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world should be saved through him,^[14] sounded like fairly typical CYA language. God washed his hands, as it were, and said, “I am innocent of [your] blood. You take care of it yourselves!”^[15] Clearly, I did not believe that God is holy.

My Pastor described the holiness of God in a sermon:^[16]

Well, holiness is a very complex idea within Scripture, a very rich idea within Scripture. It describes the perfection of moral purity. It describes the perfection of goodness. It also describes the magnificent otherness of God: That He is not like us, that his nature, his character is greater, bigger, different than anything else within creation. That He is separate from creation, over creation, more significant, more important, better than creation. All these ideas are consumed within this idea of God’s holiness.

My diminished view of God went hand in hand with my diminished view of his salvation: that He had very little to do with salvation, practically speaking. Salvation had everything to do with the individual who believed, or claimed to believe. But Jesus’ saying—No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws (ἑλκύσῃ, a form of ἑλκύω) him^[17] called my do-it-yourself salvation into serious question.

The Greek words translated to condemn and should be saved in John 3:17 above were κρίνῃ and σωθῇ respectively. Both are verbs in the subjunctive mood: “The subjunctive mood indicates probability or objective possibility. The action of the verb will possibly happen, depending on certain objective factors or circumstances.” So, technically, κρίνῃ should have been translated “that he should condemn” or judge rather than as an infinitive to condemn. But the definition of the subjunctive mood continues:

However if the subjunctive mood is used in a purpose or result clause, then the action should not be thought of as a possible result, but should be viewed as a definite outcome that will happen as a result of another stated action.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world should be saved through him, is quite clearly both the purpose and the result of, For this is the way God loved the world: He gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life. In other words, that God will not condemn the world but save the world is predicated upon the love of God and the faithfulness of Jesus Christ. It is about as certain as anything can be expressed in Koine Greek.

Jesus said: And I, when I am lifted up from the earth (he said this to indicate clearly what kind of death he was going to die^[18]), will draw (ἑλκύσω, another form of ἑλκύω) all people to myself.^[19] This powerful drawing, pulling, dragging is a promise made by the Son of God. It, too, is about as certain as anything can be expressed in Koine Greek. And it impacts our choices in the real world.

The question for any individual doesn’t boil down to some internal inventory: what do I believe? can I believe? Count on God to supply the requisite faith. The question becomes: will I quit listening to the devil? Am I done yet hurting [myself] by kicking against the goads?^[20]

Tables comparing Genesis 3:2; 3:3; 3:6; Isaiah 64:6; Judges 12:5 and 12:6 in the Tanakh, KJV and NET, and tables comparing the Greek of Genesis 3:2; 3:3; 3:6; Isaiah 64:6; Judges 12:5 and 12:6 in the Septuagint (BLB and Elpenor) follow.

Genesis 3:2 (Tanakh)	Genesis 3:2 (KJV)	Genesis 3:2 (NET)
And the woman said unto the serpent: ‘Of the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat;	And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:	The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit from the trees of the orchard;

Genesis 3:2 (Septuagint BLB)	Genesis 3:2 (Septuagint Elpenor)
καὶ εἶπεν ἡ γυνὴ τῷ ὄφει ἀπὸ καρποῦ ξύλου τοῦ παραδείσου φαγόμεθα	καὶ εἶπεν ἡ γυνὴ τῷ ὄφει· ἀπὸ καρποῦ τοῦ ξύλου τοῦ παραδείσου φαγούμεθα,
Genesis 3:2 (NETS)	Genesis 3:2 (English Elpenor)
And the woman said to the snake, “We shall eat of the fruit of the tree of the orchard,	And the woman said to the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden,

Genesis 3:3 (Tanakh)	Genesis 3:3 (KJV)	Genesis 3:3 (NET)
but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, G-d hath said: Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.’	But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.	but concerning the fruit of the tree that is in the middle of the orchard God said, ‘You must not eat from it, and you must not touch it, or else you will die.’”

Genesis 3:3 (Septuagint BLB)	Genesis 3:3 (Septuagint Elpenor)
ἀπὸ δὲ καρποῦ τοῦ ξύλου ὅ ἐστιν ἐν μέσῳ τοῦ παραδείσου εἶπεν ὁ θεός οὐ φάγεσθε ἀπ᾽ αὐτοῦ οὐδὲ μὴ ἅψησθε αὐτοῦ ἵνα μὴ ἀποθάνητε	ἀπὸ δὲ τοῦ καρποῦ τοῦ ξύλου, ὅ ἐστιν ἐν μέσῳ τοῦ παραδείσου, εἶπεν ὁ Θεός, οὐ φάγεσθε ἀπ᾿ αὐτοῦ, οὐ δὲ μὴ ἅψησθε αὐτοῦ, ἵνα μὴ ἀποθάνητε
Genesis 3:3 (NETS)	Genesis 3:3 (English Elpenor)
but of the fruit of the tree that is in the middle of the orchard, God said, ‘You shall not eat of it nor shall you even touch it, lest you die.’”	but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

Genesis 3:6 (Tanakh)	Genesis 3:6 (KJV)	Genesis 3:6 (NET)
And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat; and she gave also unto her husband with her, and he did eat.	And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.	When the woman saw that the tree produced fruit that was good for food, was attractive to the eye, and was desirable for making one wise, she took some of its fruit and ate it. She also gave some of it to her husband who was with her, and he ate it.

Genesis 3:6 (Septuagint BLB)	Genesis 3:6 (Septuagint Elpenor)
καὶ εἶδεν ἡ γυνὴ ὅτι καλὸν τὸ ξύλον εἰς βρῶσιν καὶ ὅτι ἀρεστὸν τοῗς ὀφθαλμοῗς ἰδεῗν καὶ ὡραῗόν ἐστιν τοῦ κατανοῆσαι καὶ λαβοῦσα τοῦ καρποῦ αὐτοῦ ἔφαγεν καὶ ἔδωκεν καὶ τῷ ἀνδρὶ αὐτῆς μετ᾽ αὐτῆς καὶ ἔφαγον	καὶ εἶδεν ἡ γυνή, ὅτι καλὸν τὸ ξύλον εἰς βρῶσιν καὶ ὅτι ἀρεστὸν τοῖς ὀφθαλμοῖς ἰδεῖν καὶ ὡραῖόν ἐστι τοῦ κατανοῆσαι, καὶ λαβοῦσα ἀπὸ τοῦ καρποῦ αὐτοῦ ἔφαγε· καὶ ἔδωκε καὶ τῷ ἀνδρὶ αὐτῆς μετ᾿ αὐτῆς, καὶ ἔφαγον
Genesis 3:6 (NETS)	Genesis 3:6 (English Elpenor)
And the woman saw that the tree was good for food and that it was pleasing for the eyes to look at and it was beautiful to contemplate, and when she had taken of its fruit she ate, and she also gave some to her husband with her, and they ate.	And the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes to look upon and beautiful to contemplate, and having taken of its fruit she ate, and she gave to her husband also with her, and they ate.

Isaiah 64:6 (Tanakh)	Isaiah 64:6 (KJV)	Isaiah 64:6 (NET)
But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.	But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.	We are all like one who is unclean, all our so-called righteous acts are like a menstrual rag in your sight. We all wither like a leaf; our sins carry us away like the wind.

Isaiah 64:6 (Septuagint BLB)	Isaiah 64:6 (Septuagint Elpenor)
καὶ ἐγενήθημεν ὡς ἀκάθαρτοι πάντες ἡμεῗς ὡς ῥάκος ἀποκαθημένης πᾶσα ἡ δικαιοσύνη ἡμῶν καὶ ἐξερρύημεν ὡς φύλλα διὰ τὰς ἀνομίας ἡμῶν οὕτως ἄνεμος οἴσει ἡμᾶς	καὶ ἐγενήθημεν ὡς ἀκάθαρτοι πάντες ἡμεῖς, ὡς ῥάκος ἀποκαθημένης πᾶσα ἡ δικαιοσύνη ἡμῶν· καὶ ἐξερρύημεν ὡς φύλλα διὰ τὰς ἀνομίας ἡμῶν, οὕτως ἄνεμος οἴσει ἡμᾶς
Isaiah 64:6 (NETS)	Isaiah 64:6 (English Elpenor)
And we have all become like unclean people; all our righteousness is like the rag of a woman who sits apart. And we have fallen off like leaves because of our acts of lawlessness; thus the wind will take us away.	and we are all become as unclean, and all our righteousness as a filthy rag: and we have fallen as leaves because of our iniquities; thus the wind shall carry us [away].

Judges 12:5 (Tanakh)	Judges 12:5 (KJV)	Judges 12:5 (NET)
And the Gileadites took the passages of Jordan before the Ephraimites: and it was so, that when those Ephraimites which were escaped said, Let me go over; that the men of Gilead said unto him, Art thou an Ephraimite? If he said, Nay;	And the Gileadites took the passages of Jordan before the Ephraimites: and it was so, that when those Ephraimites which were escaped said, Let me go over; that the men of Gilead said unto him, Art thou an Ephraimite? If he said, Nay;	The Gileadites captured the fords of the Jordan River opposite Ephraim. Whenever an Ephraimite fugitive said, “Let me cross over,” the men of Gilead asked him, “Are you an Ephraimite?” If he said, “No,”

Judges 12:5 (Septuagint BLB)	Judges 12:5 (Septuagint Elpenor)
καὶ προκατελάβοντο ἄνδρες Γαλααδ τὰς διαβάσεις τοῦ Ιορδάνου τοῦ Εφραιμ καὶ ἐγενήθη ὅτι εἶπαν οἱ διασεσῳσμένοι τοῦ Εφραιμ διαβῶμεν καὶ εἶπαν αὐτοῗς οἱ ἄνδρες Γαλααδ μὴ ὑμεῗς ἐκ τοῦ Εφραιμ καὶ εἶπαν οὔκ ἐσμεν	καὶ προκατελάβετο Γαλαὰδ τὰς διαβάσεις τοῦ ᾿Ιορδάνου τοῦ ᾿Εφραίμ, καὶ εἶπαν αὐτοῖς οἱ διασωζόμενοι ᾿Εφραίμ· διαβῶμεν, καὶ εἶπαν αὐτοῖς οἱ ἄνδρες Γαλαάδ· μὴ ᾿Εφραθίτης εἶ; καὶ εἶπεν· οὔ
Judges 12:5 (NETS)	Judges 12:5 (English Elpenor)
And the men of Galaad quickly seized the fords of the Jordan of Ephraim. And it came about that the fugitives of Ephraim said, “Let us pass over,” and the men of Galaad said to them, “Are you not from Ephraim?” And they said, “We are not.”	And Galaad took the fords of Jordan before Ephraim; and they that escaped of Ephraim said to them, Let us go over: and the men of Galaad said, Art thou an Ephrathite? and he said, No.

Judges 12:6 (Tanakh)	Judges 12:6 (KJV)	Judges 12:6 (NET)
Then said they unto him, Say now Shibboleth: and he said Sibboleth: for he could not frame to pronounce it right. Then they took him, and slew him at the passages of Jordan: and there fell at that time of the Ephraimites forty and two thousand.	Then said they unto him, Say now Shibboleth: and he said Sibboleth: for he could not frame to pronounce it right. Then they took him, and slew him at the passages of Jordan: and there fell at that time of the Ephraimites forty and two thousand.	then they said to him, “Say ‘Shibboleth!’” If he said, “Sibboleth” (and could not pronounce the word correctly), they grabbed him and executed him right there at the fords of the Jordan. On that day 42,000 Ephraimites fell dead.

Judges 12:6 (Septuagint BLB)	Judges 12:6 (Septuagint Elpenor)
καὶ εἶπαν αὐτοῗς εἴπατε δὴ σύνθημα καὶ οὐ κατηύθυναν τοῦ λαλῆσαι οὕτως καὶ ἐπελάβοντο αὐτῶν καὶ ἔσφαξαν αὐτοὺς ἐπὶ τὰς διαβάσεις τοῦ Ιορδάνου καὶ ἔπεσαν ἐξ Εφραιμ ἐν τῷ καιρῷ ἐκείνῳ δύο τεσσαράκοντα χιλιάδες	καὶ εἶπαν αὐτῷ· εἶπον δὴ Στάχυς· καὶ οὐ κατεύθυνε τοῦ λαλῆσαι οὕτως. καὶ ἐπελάβοντο αὐτοῦ, καὶ ἔθυσαν αὐτὸν πρὸς τὰς διαβάσεις τοῦ ᾿Ιορδάνου, καὶ ἔπεσαν ἐν τῷ καιρῷ ἐκείνῳ ἀπὸ ᾿Εφραὶμ δύο καὶ τεσσαράκοντα χιλιάδες
Judges 12:6 (NETS)	Judges 12:6 (English Elpenor)
And they said to them, “Then say: Password,” and they did not keep straight so as to say it like that. And they seized them and slew them at the fords of the Jordan. And forty-two thousand of Ephraim fell at that time.	Then they said to him, Say now Stachys; and he did not rightly pronounce it so: and they took him, and slew him at the fords of Jordan; and there fell at that time of Ephraim two and forty thousand.

Westworld, Part 4

Back to Father, Son and Holy Spirit, Part 9

Back to Who Am I? Part 14

Back to Father, Son and Holy Spirit – Part 10

Back to Keep Yourselves from Idols, Part 1

^[1] Westworld, Season 2, Episode 9, “Vanishing Point”

^[2] Genesis 1:31a (NET) Table

^[3] Romans 5:12 (NET)

^[4] John 8:31a (NET)

^[5] John 8:44a (NET) Table

^[6] Westworld, Season 2, Episode 9, “Vanishing Point”

^[7] Isaiah 64:6a (NET)

^[8] Westworld, Season 2, Episode 9, “Vanishing Point”

^[9] Westworld, Season 1, Episode 10, “The Bicameral Mind”

^[10] Westworld, Season 1, Episode 8, “Trace Decay”

^[11] Westworld, Season 2, Episode 4, “The Riddle of the Sphinx”

^[12] Galatians 2:19, 20 (NET)

^[13] Westworld, Season 1, Episode 10, “The Bicameral Mind”

^[14] John 3:17 (NET)

^[15] Matthew 27:24b (NET) Table

^[16] Adam Sanftner, Covenant Bible Church, Farmington MO 63640, August 15, 2021

^[17] John 6:44a (NET) Table

^[18] John 12:33 (NET)

^[19] John 12:32 (NET)

^[20] Acts 26:14 (NET) Table

Patterns of Evidence: Exodus

Posted on December 19, 2020 by admin

Patterns of Evidence: Exodus, A Filmmaker’s Journey by Timothy P. Mahoney was Mom’s coffee table book this Thanksgiving. I have a bit of history with my mother’s coffee table books. This time I even asked her if she leaves them out for my benefit. (She said, “No.”)

I can relate to the need to pursue this kind of project. If there is something dissuading you from believing the Bible it’s best to take Jesus by the hand and hit it head on. With a history background I’m a little more inured apparently to the historical dabbling of archaeologists than Mr. Mahoney was. My bias toward historical documents has afforded me a measure of protection here.

Mr. Mahoney’s book is the companion to a film of the same name. It’s a good film. He described it in an interview: “Is there a pattern of evidence at any time in the archaeology of Egypt and Israel that matches the events of the Exodus and the Conquest as recorded in the Bible?”^[1] I won’t steal his thunder. He and his investors deserve to make their money back. The companion book was more detailed and much more troubling to me.

The confessions he elicited from Jews (on camera) without torture or duress of any kind disturbed me. Had you asked me I would have said yes, not all those who are descended from Israel are truly Israel, nor are all the children Abraham’s true descendants.^[2] But I was clearly not prepared to have my nose rubbed in it, like some naughty puppy that has peed the carpet.

Mr. Mahoney interviewed a Jewish anthropologist in his museum workroom:

Anthropologist: I always have been Jewish, I always will be Jewish, and I believe in the tradition of Judaism. Do I think of the Bible as the word of God? No (Luke 24:25-27), I don’t….^[3]

Mahoney: Do you believe that the Exodus occurred as it is written in the Old Testament—do you believe it was a miraculous event with God intervening?

Anthropologist: No, I don’t. Do I believe the event may have happened? Yep. Sure I do. But do I believe that there was a miraculous event with God intervening? I don’t believe it… (Exodus 3:1-22) But I’m willing to be shown.^[4]

He interviewed a Jewish archaeologist in the hill country of Israel.

Mahoney: So was there an Exodus?

Archaeologist1: My easy answer to you, as an archaeologist, it didn’t happen. Not in the way its written down in the Bible…If we didn’t have the Bible, we would never, as archaeologists or as Egyptologists, be able to say this happened….^[5]

I’m Jewish, and I like to sit down at a Seder meal and enjoy recounting the Exodus. But that’s a tradition. That makes me who I am culturally. As an archaeologist, we do not see this happening as a one-off event….^[6]

Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you have handed down, Jesus said to the Pharisees and the experts in the law. And you do many things like this.^[7] Jesus’ actual point here was some specific legal wrangling about corban (κορβᾶν). And you do many things like this, opens it up in my mind to the kind of mental gymnastics cited above.

Mr. Mahoney interviewed another Jewish archaeologist in his workroom.

Archaeologist2: Exodus did not happen in the way it is described in the text of the Bible on the background of the 13^th century BC….^[8]

This same pattern of traditional thinking informed his view of the Hebrew Bible.

Archaeologist2: We are dealing with traditions (2 Timothy 3:16, 17). Let’s say that the author of this or that part of the Hebrew Bible sits in Jerusalem. And people have traditions. Grandpa says this and Grandma says another story, and there is one tradition of this village and another tradition of that family, that clan and this tribe and so on and so forth…They collected all sorts of stories, memories, myths, tales, you know. And they put them together in such a way that transmits an idea….^[9]

Mahoney: Do you believe in celebrating Passover?

Archaeologist2: When I sit at a Passover meal and we read the Haggadah with the family, that evening, it’s all history from A to Z. Perfect history…about all those many generations of my forefathers who were sitting to the same table at Passover at the same time and reciting the Haggadah….

Mahoney: What would you say to those people who are concerned with the idea that these stories didn’t happen as they are written?

Archaeologist2: I would tell them that it is not important…I think that it is more important to understand the meaning of Exodus, the moral of Exodus, for our civilization, for humanity, for mankind, for understanding the biblical text and the authors….^[10]

“As I have mentioned before,” Mr. Mahoney wrote, this particular archaeologist’s “work and ideas greatly influenced” a Jewish Rabbi “to write his controversial Passover sermon.”^[11] Michael Medved asked this Rabbi about that sermon:

Rabbi: I said that the Exodus certainly didn’t happen the way the Bible depicts it, assuming that it was a historical event in any description….

Medved: Why did you say that?

Rabbi: I said it for two reasons. One was because I knew that these students and others would go off to college and hear people talk about biblical archaeology and comparative religion, and I wanted them to know that that was not a frightening topic….^[12]

This Rabbi regarded the Exodus as fiction:

Rabbi: The extent to which the Exodus story has a historical core is very hard to say, but my deeper conviction about it is that it’s a story that whether it was true, it is true. And those are two different things…there are things that aren’t facts that can be truths….^[13]

Medved: What did you want people to feel, not to think, but to feel about the Exodus?

Rabbi: I wanted them to feel that their faith was unshakable, that it didn’t matter what the conclusions were of archaeologists, scientists and historians….^[14]

Medved: What does [Passover] mean if we weren’t delivered from Egypt?

Rabbi: Whether or not people were delivered then, does that affect my ability to empathize with what slavery is like now?^[15]

Mr. Mahoney interviewed a Jewish politician in the Knesset who seemed to echo the Rabbi’s emphasis on slavery:

Moses was the greatest revolutionary of all time. Remember that in antiquity there were grand empires that were based on one principal: slavery (Deuteronomy 15:12-18). Moses challenged that twice. He challenged it by taking his people, who were slaves in bondage in Egypt, freeing them, and taking them to their promised land. But Moses also challenged the empires of the world by providing a moral code for mankind that said it is not the king or the emperor who decides the law. There is a higher law (Deuteronomy 17:18-20). These were absolutely revolutionary ideas.^[16]

If the reason given for celebrating the Passover was: for in this selfsame day have I brought your hosts out of the land of Egypt,^[17] a feast to HaShem,^[18] then staying home to celebrate it “to empathize with what slavery is like now” is almost as disobedient as going out and doing something else instead.

Masoretic Text		Septuagint
Exodus 12:14, 17 (Tanakh)	Exodus 12:14, 17 (NET)	Exodus 12:14, 17 (NETS)	Exodus 12:14, 17 (Elpenor English)
And this day shall be unto you for a memorial, and ye shall keep it a feast to HaShem; throughout your generations ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance for ever.	“‘This day will become a memorial for you, and you will celebrate it as a festival to the Lord—you will celebrate it perpetually as a lasting ordinance.	And this day shall be a memorial for you, and you shall celebrate it as a feast to the Lord throughout your generations. You shall celebrate it as a perpetual precept.	And this day shall be to you a memorial, and ye shall keep it a feast to the Lord through all your generations; ye shall keep it a feast for a perpetual ordinance.
And ye shall observe the feast of unleavened bread; for in this selfsame day have I brought your hosts out of the land of Egypt; therefore shall ye observe this day throughout your generations by an ordinance for ever.	So you will keep the Feast of Unleavened Bread, because on this very day I brought your regiments out from the land of Egypt, and so you must keep this day perpetually as a lasting ordinance.	And you shall keep this commandment. For on this day I will bring your host out of the land of Egypt, and you shall make this day throughout your generations a perpetual precept.	And ye shall keep this commandment, for on this day will I bring out your force out of the land of Egypt; and ye shall make this day a perpetual ordinance for you throughout your generations.

Mr. Mahoney interviewed another Jewish archaeologist in his teaching lab.

Archaeologist3: …as I used to tell my students, archaeology is about 10 percent data and 90 percent interpretation. And this is why I’d say it is controversial in many aspects and open to different opinions….^[19]

This confession proved to be more important than it appeared at first. Mr. Mahoney, a filmmaker, did an admirable job of demonstrating from archaeological data and a few documentary fragments where the events of Exodus in the Bible fit sequentially into that archaeological data. He went on to demonstrate that Jewish archaeologists (among others) reject this correlation in favor of their own interpretations of the data. In other words, they reject the Hebrew scriptures to cling to their faith in their own works, their own interpretations as archaeologists. You can’t make this stuff up.

The interview continued:

Mahoney: You believe the Exodus and the Conquest are legendary stories? You don’t see them in the archaeology, is that right?

Archaeologist3: No, we don’t see them at all. We see something different. Many times people tell us absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, but the point is, as I used to say, paradoxically, the more information we have on biblical matters, the more contradictions we’ve found…we have hundreds of sites now of different periods and millions of objects which indicate an archaeological reality. And this reality says the Israelites did not come from outside the land of Canaan. They did not conquer the land. They simply evolved from within the local community to a new phase of economic and social organization, which later developed into the state of Israel. So, the process was entirely different than described in the Bible….^[20]

The Exodus story is a very important and interesting legend about the people of Israel, but it has no real historical basis….^[21]

So Israelites are merely Canaanites with delusions of grandeur? Why do I, a natural born Gentile Christian turned atheist, have more confidence in the Hebrew scriptures than a Jewish anthropologist, Jewish archaeologists, a Rabbi or a Jewish politician? Jesus.

Jesus is dragging me out of my Gentile-Christian-turned-atheist-ness to Himself (John 12:32). His own confidence in the Hebrew scriptures directed his actions toward their fulfillment: How then would the scriptures that say it must happen this way be fulfilled?^[22] He asked Peter. Does this mean that I am inspired to faith by Jesus’ faith?

Well, okay, sure. But I’m also inspired to courage, determination and some faith at the climax of Avengers: Endgame when Captain America (Chris Evans), bruised, fallen, all but defeated, tightens the strap of his broken shield on his arm and stands again to face Thanos (Josh Brolin) and his armies, alone if necessary. The trouble with this kind of inspiration is that it can only awaken the courage, determination or faith already latent within me.

In Jesus I am born from above and filled with his own Holy Spirit just as He promised. My faith is not my faith^[23] but his (it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me^[24]), the same faith that flowed into and through Him from the same Spirit when He asked: How then would the scriptures that say it must happen this way be fulfilled? Jesus also said, Do not be afraid^[25] of those who kill^[26] the body but cannot kill the soul.^[27]

Archaeologists cannot kill the body. This is not to say that an individual archaeologist is incapable of murderer, just that archaeologists as archaeologists have no authority beyond the grades handed down in their classrooms. The entire field of archaeology, that interpretive work of archaeologists, is a “finite province of meaning” relative to the “paramount reality” of most people’s everyday lives. Most people are unlikely to hear, in fact most people do not hear, about most of the interpretations of data uncovered by archaeologists, unless those interpretations prove useful to Satan, who deceives the whole world.

Given the limited authority archaeologists actually have over others it may seem like overkill to apply Jesus’ prohibition to them: Do not be afraid of archaeologists. But I actually agree with the Rabbi that archaeology is “not a frightening topic.” When I understand Jesus’ prohibition as a negation of the definition I gleaned from Deuteronomy of the the fear of the Lord—Do not have a heart to hear and do whatsoever archaeologists shall speak—I am free to choose what I will hear with what measure of faith.

Anyone interested in archaeology should take the Jewish archaeologist’s instruction to his students to heart: “archaeology is about 10 percent data and 90 percent interpretation.” Every student is free to distinguish that germ of data from the mass of interpretation and judge that interpretation accordingly, based on all that student’s knowledge, including the Bible as the word of God.

Answers to test questions in school are not assertions of truth a student must believe. They are simply a measure of a student’s proficiency taking notes and repeating what a teacher has said. A student is not forsworn by recalling what a teacher has said and writing it down accurately on a test. All rights to one’s own thoughts and beliefs are fully retained, even after an archaeology test.

Archaeology, archaeologists’ interpretations of archaeological data, is no reason to let Satan rob you of your opportunity to know…the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom [He] sent,^[28] to be born from above (John 3:5-7), to receive his Holy Spirit, to be bouyed up and carried along by a continuous stream of God’s own love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control^[29] here and now.

Jesus said: No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him….^[30] And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, He promised, will draw all…to myself.^[31] Paul wrote: So then, it does not depend on human desire or exertion, but on God who shows mercy.^[32] For God has consigned all…to disobedience so that he may show mercy to…all.^[33]

When I hear these things I tighten the strap of the shield of faith on my arm. Do you? Or are you hurting yourself by kicking against the goads?^[34]

Tables comparing Exodus 12:17 and 12:14 in the Tanakh, KJV and NET, and tables comparing Exodus 12:17 and 12:14 in the Septuagint (BLB and Elpenor) follow. A Table comparing Matthew 10:28 in the NET and KJV follows those.

Exodus 12:17 (Tanakh)	Exodus 12:17 (KJV)	Exodus 12:17 (NET)
And ye shall observe the feast of unleavened bread; for in this selfsame day have I brought your hosts out of the land of Egypt; therefore shall ye observe this day throughout your generations by an ordinance for ever.	And ye shall observe the feast of unleavened bread; for in this selfsame day have I brought your armies out of the land of Egypt: therefore shall ye observe this day in your generations by an ordinance for ever.	So you will keep the Feast of Unleavened Bread, because on this very day I brought your regiments out from the land of Egypt, and so you must keep this day perpetually as a lasting ordinance.

Exodus 12:17 (Septuagint BLB)	Exodus 12:17 (Septuagint Elpenor)
καὶ φυλάξεσθε τὴν ἐντολὴν ταύτην ἐν γὰρ τῇ ἡμέρᾳ ταύτῃ ἐξάξω τὴν δύναμιν ὑμῶν ἐκ γῆς Αἰγύπτου καὶ ποιήσετε τὴν ἡμέραν ταύτην εἰς γενεὰς ὑμῶν νόμιμον αἰώνιον	καὶ φυλάξετε τὴν ἐντολὴν ταύτην· ἐν γὰρ τῇ ἡμέρᾳ ταύτῃ ἐξάξω τὴν δύναμιν ὑμῶν ἐκ γῆς Αἰγύπτου, καὶ ποιήσετε τὴν ἡμέραν ταύτην εἰς γενεὰς ὑμῶν νόμιμον αἰώνιον
Exodus 12:17 (NETS)	Exodus 12:17 (English Elpenor)
And you shall keep this commandment. For on this day I will bring your host out of the land of Egypt, and you shall make this day throughout your generations a perpetual precept.	And ye shall keep this commandment, for on this day will I bring out your force out of the land of Egypt; and ye shall make this day a perpetual ordinance for you throughout your generations.

Exodus 12:14 (Tanakh)	Exodus 12:14 (KJV)	Exodus 12:14 (NET)
And this day shall be unto you for a memorial, and ye shall keep it a feast to HaShem; throughout your generations ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance for ever.	And this day shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast to the LORD throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance for ever.	“‘This day will become a memorial for you, and you will celebrate it as a festival to the Lord—you will celebrate it perpetually as a lasting ordinance.

Exodus 12:14 (Septuagint BLB)	Exodus 12:14 (Septuagint Elpenor)
καὶ ἔσται ἡ ἡμέρα ὑμῗν αὕτη μνημόσυνον καὶ ἑορτάσετε αὐτὴν ἑορτὴν κυρίῳ εἰς πάσας τὰς γενεὰς ὑμῶν νόμιμον αἰώνιον ἑορτάσετε αὐτήν	καὶ ἔσται ἡ ἡμέρα ὑμῖν αὕτη μνημόσυνον· καὶ ἑορτάσετε αὐτὴν ἑορτὴν Κυρίῳ εἰς πάσας τὰς γενεὰς ὑμῶν· νόμιμον αἰώνιον ἑορτάσετε αὐτήν
Exodus 12:14 (NETS)	Exodus 12:14 (English Elpenor)
And this day shall be a memorial for you, and you shall celebrate it as a feast to the Lord throughout your generations. You shall celebrate it as a perpetual precept.	And this day shall be to you a memorial, and ye shall keep it a feast to the Lord through all your generations; ye shall keep it a feast for a perpetual ordinance.

Matthew 10:28 (NET)	Matthew 10:28 (KJV)
Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Instead, fear the one who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.	And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
καὶ μὴ \|φοβεῖσθε\| ἀπὸ τῶν \|ἀποκτεννόντων\| τὸ σῶμα, τὴν δὲ ψυχὴν μὴ δυναμένων ἀποκτεῖναι· φοβεῖσθε δὲ μᾶλλον τὸν δυνάμενον καὶ ψυχὴν καὶ σῶμα ἀπολέσαι ἐν γεέννῃ	και μη φοβηθητε απο των αποκτεινοντων το σωμα την δε ψυχην μη δυναμενων αποκτειναι φοβηθητε δε μαλλον τον δυναμενον και ψυχην και σωμα απολεσαι εν γεεννη	και μη φοβεισθε απο των αποκτενοντων το σωμα την δε ψυχην μη δυναμενων αποκτειναι φοβηθητε δε μαλλον τον δυναμενον και την ψυχην και το σωμα απολεσαι εν γεεννη

^[1] “Timothy Mahoney Interview on Patterns of Evidence,” July 21, 2015, TheBestSchools

^[2] Romans 9:6b, 7a (NET)

^[3] “Patterns of Evidence: Exodus, A Filmmaker’s Journey,” by Timothy P. Mahoney; with Steven Law; St. Louis Park: MN, Thinking Man Media, 2015, p. 38

^[4] ibid, pp. 38-39

^[5] ibid, p. 51

^[6] ibid, p. 52

^[7] Mark 7:13 (NET)

^[8] “Patterns of Evidence: Exodus, A Filmmaker’s Journey,” by Timothy P. Mahoney; with Steven Law; St. Louis Park: MN, Thinking Man Media, 2015, p. 55

^[9] ibid, pp. 56-57

^[10] ibid, p. 173

^[11] ibid, p. 173

^[12] ibid, p. 42

^[13] ibid, p. 43

^[14] ibid, pp. 173, 174

^[15] ibid, p. 174

^[16] ibid, p. 66

^[17] Exodus 12:17b (Tanakh)

^[18] Exodus 12:14 (Tanakh) The Hebrew word translated Hashem was לַֽיהֹוָ֑ה (Yehovah).

^[19] “Patterns of Evidence: Exodus, A Filmmaker’s Journey,” by Timothy P. Mahoney; with Steven Law; St. Louis Park: MN, Thinking Man Media, 2015, pp. 59, 60

^[20] ibid, pp. 60, 61

^[21] ibid, p. 61

^[22] Matthew 26:54 (NET)

^[23] The Greek word translated faithfulness in Galatians 5:22 (NET) was πίστις.

^[24] Galatians 2:20b (NET)

^[25] The NET parallel Greek text, NA²⁸ and Byzantine Majority Text had φοβεῖσθε here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus had φοβηθητε (KJV: fear).

^[26] The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had ἀποκτεννόντων here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus had αποκτεινοντων and the Byzantine Majority Text had αποκτενοντων.

^[27] Matthew 10:28a (NET)

^[28] John 17:3 (NET)

^[29] Galatians 5:22b-23a (NET) Table

^[30] John 6:44a (NET) Table

^[31] John 12:32 (NET) NET note (67): Grk “all.” The word “people” is not in the Greek text but is supplied for stylistic reasons and for clarity (cf. KJV “all men”). I removed people for accuracy: καγὼ ἐὰν ὑψωθῶ ἐκ τῆς γῆς, πάντας ἑλκύσω πρὸς ἐμαυτόν. There is no word limiting this drawing to people in the Greek text.

^[32] Romans 9:16 (NET) Table

^[33] Romans 11:32 (NET) NET note (24): Grk “to all”; “them” has been supplied for stylistic reasons. Here again I removed people and them: συνέκλεισεν γὰρ ὁ θεὸς τοὺς πάντας εἰς ἀπείθειαν, ἵνα τοὺς πάντας ἐλεήσῃ. I wrote about τοὺς πάντας in another essay. For God was pleased to have all (πᾶν) his fullness dwell in the Son and through him to reconcile all things (τὰ πάντα) to himself by making peace through the blood of his cross—through him, whether things on earth or things in heaven (Colossians 1:19, 20 NET).

^[34] Acts 26:14b (NET) Table

Father, Forgive Them – Part 5

Posted on December 28, 2018 by admin

Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet.^[1] “That’s me,” I responded as I read that this time. The Greek word translated enemies was ἐχθρούς (a form of ἐχθρός). For if while we were enemies (ἐχθροὶ, another form of ἐχθρός), Paul wrote believers in Rome, we were reconciled to God through the death of his Son, how much more, since we have been reconciled, will we be saved by his life?^[2] But I’d never thought of it this way before.

I had vaguely assumed that making his enemies a footstool referenced Jesus as He treads the wine press of the fierce wrath of God, the Almighty.^[3] As I looked at other quotations of Psalm 110:1 in the New Testament it made a little sense why I had thought that.

NET and Parallel Greek
Matthew 22:44	Mark 12:36b	Luke 20:42b, 43	Acts 2:34b, 35	Hebrews 1:13b
‘*The^[4] Lord said to my lord,* “*Sit at my right hand,* *until I put your enemies under^[5] your feet*”’?	‘*The^[6] Lord said^[7] to my lord,* “*Sit at my right hand,* *until I put your enemies under^[8] your feet*.”’	‘*The^[9] Lord said to my lord,* “*Sit at my right hand,*	‘*The Lord said to my lord,* “*Sit at my right hand*	“*Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet*”?
		*until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet*.”’	*until I make your enemies a footstool* for your feet.”’
εἶπεν κύριος τῷ κυρίῳ μου κάθου ἐκ δεξιῶν μου, ἕως ἂν θῶ τοὺς ἐχθρούς σου ὑποκάτω τῶν ποδῶν σου	εἶπεν κύριος τῷ κυρίῳ μου κάθου ἐκ δεξιῶν μου, ἕως ἂν θῶ τοὺς ἐχθρούς σου ὑποκάτω τῶν ποδῶν σου	εἶπεν κύριος τῷ κυρίῳ μου κάθου ἐκ δεξιῶν μου	εἶπεν [ὁ] κύριος τῷ κυρίῳ μου κάθου ἐκ δεξιῶν μου	κάθου ἐκ δεξιῶν μου, ἕως ἂν θῶ τοὺς ἐχθρούς σου ὑποπόδιον τῶν ποδῶν σου
		ἕως ἂν θῶ τοὺς ἐχθρούς σου ὑποπόδιον τῶν ποδῶν σου	ἕως ἂν θῶ τοὺς ἐχθρούς σου ὑποπόδιον τῶν ποδῶν σου

There was another allusion to Psalm 110:1 in Hebrews 10:12, 13 (NET):

But when this priest^[10] had offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, he sat down at the right hand of God, where he is now waiting until his enemies are made a footstool for his feet.

There are some differences from the Septuagint mostly related to the changes from present to past tense, and from second and first to third person:

Hebrews 10:12b (NET Parallel Greek)	Psalm 110:1a (Septuagint BLB)	Psalm 109:1a (Septuagint Elpenor)
ἐκάθισεν ἐν δεξιᾷ τοῦ θεοῦ	κάθου ἐκ δεξιῶν μου	κάθου ἐκ δεξιῶν μου

Hebrews 10:13b (NET Parallel Greek)	Psalm 110:1b (Septuagint BLB)	Psalm 109:1b (Septuagint Elpenor)
ἕως τεθῶσιν οἱ ἐχθροὶ αὐτοῦ ὑποπόδιον τῶν ποδῶν αὐτοῦ	ἕως ἂν θῶ τοὺς ἐχθρούς σου ὑποπόδιον τῶν ποδῶν σου	ἕως ἂν θῶ τοὺς ἐχθρούς σου ὑποπόδιον τῶν ποδῶν σου

The noun ὑποπόδιον (footstool) in Hebrews 1:13, and 10:13, Acts 2:35 and Luke 20:43 was replaced by the adverb ὑποκάτω (under) in Matthew 22:44 and Mark 12:36. The Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had ὑποπόδιον in both cases (Table1 and Table2) as did both versions of the Septuagint.

Matthew 22:44 (NET Parallel Greek)	Psalm 110:1 (Septuagint BLB)	Psalm 109:1 (Septuagint Elpenor)
εἶπεν κύριος τῷ κυρίῳ μου κάθου ἐκ δεξιῶν μου, ἕως ἂν θῶ τοὺς ἐχθρούς σου ὑποκάτω τῶν ποδῶν σου	εἶπεν ὁ κύριος τῷ κυρίῳ μου κάθου ἐκ δεξιῶν μου ἕως ἂν θῶ τοὺς ἐχθρούς σου ὑποπόδιον τῶν ποδῶν σου	ΕΙΠΕΝ ὁ Κύριος τῷ Κυρίῳ μου· κάθου ἐκ δεξιῶν μου, ἕως ἂν θῶ τοὺς ἐχθρούς σου ὑποπόδιον τῶν ποδῶν σου

Mark 12:36b (NET Parallel Greek)	Psalm 110:1 (Septuagint BLB)	Psalm 109:1 (Septuagint Elpenor)
εἶπεν κύριος τῷ κυρίῳ μου κάθου ἐκ δεξιῶν μου, ἕως ἂν θῶ τοὺς ἐχθρούς σου ὑποκάτω τῶν ποδῶν σου	εἶπεν ὁ κύριος τῷ κυρίῳ μου κάθου ἐκ δεξιῶν μου ἕως ἂν θῶ τοὺς ἐχθρούς σου ὑποπόδιον τῶν ποδῶν σου	ΕΙΠΕΝ ὁ Κύριος τῷ Κυρίῳ μου· κάθου ἐκ δεξιῶν μου, ἕως ἂν θῶ τοὺς ἐχθρούς σου ὑποπόδιον τῶν ποδῶν σου

The Hebrew was הדם (hădôm) and לרגליך (regel), also translated footstool in the Tanakh.

From Hebrew		From Greek
Psalm 110:1 (Tanakh)	Psalm 110:1 (KJV)	Psalm 109:1 (NETS)	Psalm 109:1 (Elpenor English)
The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.	The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.	The Lord said to my lord, “Sit on my right until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet.”	The Lord said to my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.

According to Strong’s Concordance הדם (hădôm) was “From an unused root meaning to stamp upon.” Paul alluded to Psalm 8:6 (1 Corinthians 15:24-28 NET; Table):

Then comes the end, when [Jesus] hands over the kingdom to God the Father, when he has brought to an end all rule and all authority and power. For he must reign until^[11] he has put^[12] all his enemies under his feet. The last enemy to be eliminated is death. For he has put everything in subjection under his feet. But when it says “everything” has been put in subjection, it is clear that this does not include the one who put everything in subjection to him. And when all things are subjected to him, then the Son himself will be subjected to the one who subjected everything to him, so that God may be all in all.

Though Paul used ὑπὸ here both versions of the Septuagint had ὑποκάτω. The other differences are accounted for by switching from 2^nd to 3^rd person and from the genitive to the accusative case.

1 Corinthians 15:27a (NET Parallel Greek)	Psalm 8:6b (Septuagint BLB)	Psalm 8:7b (Septuagint Elpenor)
πάντα γὰρ ὑπέταξεν ὑπὸ τοὺς πόδας αὐτοῦ	σου πάντα ὑπέταξας ὑποκάτω τῶν ποδῶν αὐτοῦ	σου· πάντα ὑπέταξας ὑποκάτω τῶν ποδῶν αὐτοῦ

Though I didn’t realize it before I did this study, the first verse of Psalm 8 in the Elpenor version of the Septuagint reads: Εἰς τὸ τέλος, ὑπὲρ τῶν ληνῶν· ψαλμὸς τῷ Δαυΐδ (“For the end, concerning the wine-presses, a Psalm of David”). The writer of Hebrews quoted Psalm 8:6, You put all things under his control,^[13] including ὑποκάτω (under).

Hebrews 2:8a (NET Parallel Greek)	Psalm 8:6b (Septuagint BLB)	Psalm 8:7b (Septuagint Elpenor)
πάντα ὑπέταξας ὑποκάτω τῶν ποδῶν αὐτοῦ	σου πάντα ὑπέταξας ὑποκάτω τῶν ποδῶν αὐτοῦ	σου· πάντα ὑπέταξας ὑποκάτω τῶν ποδῶν αὐτοῦ

Yet this time for some inexplicable reason as I read—Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet—the planet-sized hassock of corpses evaporated back into my imagination as I recognized that Jesus’ planet-sized footstool is made of living people, people like Mary.

Now it was Mary^[14] who anointed the Lord with perfumed oil and wiped his feet dry with her hair.^[15] I imagine it was just as inexplicable to her that she, a sinner, when she learned^[16] that Jesus was dining^[17] at the Pharisee’s house…brought an alabaster jar of perfumed oil;^[18] weeping, she began to wet his feet with her tears. She wiped them with her hair, kissed them, and anointed them with the perfumed oil.^[19]

Jesus explained the inexplicable: No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him…It is written in the prophets, ‘And they will all be taught by^[20] God.’ Everyone^[21] who hears^[22] and learns from the Father comes to me.^[23] I had misunderstood this as a severe limitation to my whosoever-will-may-come belief. But the Holy Spirit contrasted it to the difficulty those willful few had finding their own way through the rituals of old covenant religion. How^[24] narrow is the gate and difficult the way that leads to life, Jesus summarized, and there are few who find it!^[25]

Mary^[26]…sat^[27] at^[28] the Lord’s^[29] feet and listened to what he said.^[30] And again, Mary^[31] took three quarters of a pound of expensive aromatic oil from pure nard and anointed the feet of Jesus^[32] about a week before his crucifixion.

I was formerly^[33] a blasphemer and a persecutor, and an arrogant man, the apostle Paul confessed. But^[34] I was treated with mercy because I acted ignorantly (ἀγνοῶν, a form of ἀγνοέω) in unbelief, and our Lord’s grace was abundant, bringing faith and love in Christ Jesus.^[35] Father, forgive them, Jesus prayed, for they don’t know what they are doing.^[36] The Greek word translated know was οἴδασιν (a form of εἴδω; see). They didn’t see what they were doing. They acted ignorantly in unbelief (ἀπιστίᾳ).

When Jesus appeared to Paul (a.k.a. Saul) as a blinding light on the road to Damascus, He said, You are hurting (σκληρόν, a form of σκληρός) yourself by kicking against the goads.^[37] Paul’s religious mind fought so hard against that inexplicable drawing of God—denying what he was taught, heard and learned from the Father so completely—that the risen and ascended Lord Jesus was concerned about the harm he caused himself. And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, Jesus had promised, will draw all people to myself,^[38] even an angry jihadist like Saul.

This should not be forgotten though we may be more aware of what God’s abundant grace bringing faith and love in Christ Jesus made of him: for the one bringing forth in you both the desire and the effort, Paul wrote from experience (Colossians 1:28, 29), for the sake of his good pleasure – is God.^[39]

I had begun to hear—Father, forgive them, for they don’t know what they are doing—as something more than a limited and local prayer. I regard it, in fact, as the singularly relevant prayer of a salvation that does not depend on human desire or exertion, but on God who shows mercy.^[40] But I was uncertain of God the Father’s answer to that prayer until that day I heard, Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet. His enemies made into his footstool was Jesus’ joy (Hebrews 12:2b NET):

For the joy set out for him he endured the cross, disregarding its shame, and has taken his seat^[41] at the right hand of the throne of God.

Tables comparing Matthew 22:44; Mark 12:36; Luke 20:42; 1 Corinthians 15:25; John 11:2; Luke 7:37; John 6:45; Matthew 7:14; Luke 10:39; John 12:3; 1 Timothy 1:13; Acts 26:14; Philippians 2:13 and Hebrews 12:2 in the NET and KJV follow.

Matthew 22:44 (NET)	Matthew 22:44 (KJV)
‘The Lord said to my lord, “Sit at my right hand, until I put your enemies under your feet”’?	The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool?

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
εἶπεν κύριος τῷ κυρίῳ μου κάθου ἐκ δεξιῶν μου, ἕως ἂν θῶ τοὺς ἐχθρούς σου ὑποκάτω τῶν ποδῶν σου	ειπεν ο κυριος τω κυριω μου καθου εκ δεξιων μου εως αν θω τους εχθρους σου υποποδιον των ποδων σου	ειπεν ο κυριος τω κυριω μου καθου εκ δεξιων μου εως αν θω τους εχθρους σου υποποδιον των ποδων σου

Mark 12:36 (NET)	Mark 12:36 (KJV)
David himself, by the Holy Spirit, said, ‘The Lord said to my lord, “Sit at my right hand, until I put your enemies under your feet.”’	For David himself said by the Holy Ghost, The LORD said to my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool.

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
αὐτὸς Δαυὶδ εἶπεν ἐν τῷ πνεύματι τῷ ἁγίῳ εἶπεν κύριος τῷ κυρίῳ μου κάθου ἐκ δεξιῶν μου, ἕως ἂν θῶ τοὺς ἐχθρούς σου ὑποκάτω τῶν ποδῶν σου	αυτος γαρ δαβιδ ειπεν εν τω πνευματι τω αγιω ειπεν ο κυριος τω κυριω μου καθου εκ δεξιων μου εως αν θω τους εχθρους σου υποποδιον των ποδων σου	αυτος γαρ δαυιδ ειπεν εν πνευματι αγιω λεγει ο κυριος τω κυριω μου καθου εκ δεξιων μου εως αν θω τους εχθρους σου υποποδιον των ποδων σου

Luke 20:42 (NET)	Luke 20:42 (KJV)
For David himself says in the book of Psalms, ‘The Lord said to my lord, “Sit at my right hand,	And David himself saith in the book of Psalms, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand,

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
αὐτὸς γὰρ Δαυὶδ λέγει ἐν βίβλῳ ψαλμῶν εἶπεν κύριος τῷ κυρίῳ μου κάθου ἐκ δεξιῶν μου	και αυτος δαβιδ λεγει εν βιβλω ψαλμων ειπεν ο κυριος τω κυριω μου καθου εκ δεξιων μου	και αυτος δαυιδ λεγει εν βιβλω ψαλμων ειπεν ο κυριος τω κυριω μου καθου εκ δεξιων μου

1 Corinthians 15:25 (NET)	1 Corinthians 15:25 (KJV)
For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet.	For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
δεῖ γὰρ αὐτὸν βασιλεύειν ἄχρι οὗ θῇ πάντας τοὺς ἐχθροὺς ὑπὸ τοὺς πόδας αὐτοῦ	δει γαρ αυτον βασιλευειν αχρις ου αν θη παντας τους εχθρους υπο τους ποδας αυτου	δει γαρ αυτον βασιλευειν αχρις ου αν θη παντας τους εχθρους υπο τους ποδας αυτου

John 11:2 (NET)	John 11:2 (KJV)
Now it was Mary who anointed the Lord with perfumed oil and wiped his feet dry with her hair, whose brother Lazarus was sick.	It was that Mary which anointed the Lord with ointment, and wiped his feet with her hair, whose brother Lazarus was sick.

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
ἦν δὲ Μαριὰμ ἡ ἀλείψασα τὸν κύριον μύρῳ καὶ ἐκμάξασα τοὺς πόδας αὐτοῦ ταῖς θριξὶν αὐτῆς, ἧς ὁ ἀδελφὸς Λάζαρος ἠσθένει	ην δε μαρια η αλειψασα τον κυριον μυρω και εκμαξασα τους ποδας αυτου ταις θριξιν αυτης ης ο αδελφος λαζαρος ησθενει	ην δε μαρια η αλειψασα τον κυριον μυρω και εκμαξασα τους ποδας αυτου ταις θριξιν αυτης ης ο αδελφος λαζαρος ησθενει

Luke 7:37 (NET)	Luke 7:37 (KJV)
Then when a woman of that town, who was a sinner, learned that Jesus was dining at the Pharisee’s house, she brought an alabaster jar of perfumed oil.	And, behold, a woman in the city, which was a sinner, when she knew that Jesus sat at meat in the Pharisee’s house, brought an alabaster box of ointment,

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
καὶ ἰδοὺ γυνὴ ἥτις ἦν ἐν τῇ πόλει ἁμαρτωλός, καὶ ἐπιγνοῦσα ὅτι κατάκειται ἐν τῇ οἰκίᾳ τοῦ Φαρισαίου, κομίσασα ἀλάβαστρον μύρου	και ιδου γυνη εν τη πολει ητις ην αμαρτωλος επιγνουσα οτι ανακειται εν τη οικια του φαρισαιου κομισασα αλαβαστρον μυρου	και ιδου γυνη εν τη πολει ητις ην αμαρτωλος και επιγνουσα οτι ανακειται εν τη οικια του φαρισαιου κομισασα αλαβαστρον μυρου

John 6:45 (NET)	John 6:45 (KJV)
It is written in the prophets, ‘And they will all be taught by God.’ Everyone who hears and learns from the Father comes to me.	It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me.

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
ἔστιν γεγραμμένον ἐν τοῖς προφήταις· καὶ ἔσονται πάντες διδακτοὶ θεοῦ· πᾶς ὁ ἀκούσας παρὰ τοῦ πατρὸς καὶ μαθὼν ἔρχεται πρὸς ἐμέ	εστιν γεγραμμενον εν τοις προφηταις και εσονται παντες διδακτοι του θεου πας ουν ο ακουσας παρα του πατρος και μαθων ερχεται προς με	εστιν γεγραμμενον εν τοις προφηταις και εσονται παντες διδακτοι θεου πας ουν ο ακουων παρα του πατρος και μαθων ερχεται προς με

Matthew 7:14 (NET)	Matthew 7:14 (KJV)
How narrow is the gate and difficult the way that leads to life, and there are few who find it!	Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
\|τί\| στενὴ ἡ πύλη καὶ τεθλιμμένη ἡ ὁδὸς ἡ ἀπάγουσα εἰς τὴν ζωὴν καὶ ὀλίγοι εἰσὶν οἱ εὑρίσκοντες αὐτήν	οτι στενη η πυλη και τεθλιμμενη η οδος η απαγουσα εις την ζωην και ολιγοι εισιν οι ευρισκοντες αυτην	τι στενη η πυλη και τεθλιμμενη η οδος η απαγουσα εις την ζωην και ολιγοι εισιν οι ευρισκοντες αυτην

Luke 10:39 (NET)	Luke 10:39 (KJV)
She had a sister named Mary, who sat at the Lord’s feet and listened to what he said.	And she had a sister called Mary, which also sat at Jesus’ feet, and heard his word.

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
καὶ τῇδε ἦν ἀδελφὴ καλουμένη Μαριάμ , [ἣ] καὶ παρακαθεσθεῖσα πρὸς τοὺς πόδας τοῦ κυρίου ἤκουεν τὸν λόγον αὐτοῦ	και τηδε ην αδελφη καλουμενη μαρια η και παρακαθισασα παρα τους ποδας του ιησου ηκουεν τον λογον αυτου	και τηδε ην αδελφη καλουμενη μαρια η και παρακαθισασα παρα τους ποδας του ιησου ηκουεν τον λογον αυτου

John 12:3 (NET)	John 12:3 (KJV)
Then Mary took three quarters of a pound of expensive aromatic oil from pure nard and anointed the feet of Jesus. She then wiped his feet dry with her hair. (Now the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfumed oil.)	Then took Mary a pound of ointment of spikenard, very costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped his feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the odour of the ointment.

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
Ἡ οὖν Μαριὰμ λαβοῦσα λίτραν μύρου νάρδου πιστικῆς πολυτίμου ἤλειψεν τοὺς πόδας \|τοῦ\| Ἰησοῦ καὶ ἐξέμαξεν ταῖς θριξὶν αὐτῆς τοὺς πόδας αὐτοῦ· (ἡ δὲ οἰκία ἐπληρώθη ἐκ τῆς ὀσμῆς τοῦ μύρου.)	η ουν μαρια λαβουσα λιτραν μυρου ναρδου πιστικης πολυτιμου ηλειψεν τους ποδας του ιησου και εξεμαξεν ταις θριξιν αυτης τους ποδας αυτου η δε οικια επληρωθη εκ της οσμης του μυρου	η ουν μαρια λαβουσα λιτραν μυρου ναρδου πιστικης πολυτιμου ηλειψεν τους ποδας του ιησου και εξεμαξεν ταις θριξιν αυτης τους ποδας αυτου η δε οικια επληρωθη εκ της οσμης του μυρου

1 Timothy 1:13 (NET)	1 Timothy 1:13 (KJV)
even though I was formerly a blasphemer and a persecutor, and an arrogant man. But I was treated with mercy because I acted ignorantly in unbelief,	Who was before a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious: but I obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly in unbelief.

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
τὸ πρότερον ὄντα βλάσφημον καὶ διώκτην καὶ ὑβριστήν, ἀλλὰ ἠλεήθην, ὅτι ἀγνοῶν ἐποίησα ἐν ἀπιστίᾳ	τον προτερον οντα βλασφημον και διωκτην και υβριστην αλλ ηλεηθην οτι αγνοων εποιησα εν απιστια	τον προτερον οντα βλασφημον και διωκτην και υβριστην αλλα ηλεηθην οτι αγνοων εποιησα εν απιστια

Acts 26:14 (NET)	Acts 26:14 (KJV)
When we had all fallen to the ground, I heard a voice saying to me in Aramaic, ‘Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me? You are hurting yourself by kicking against the goads.’	And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto me, and saying in the Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
πάντων τε καταπεσόντων ἡμῶν εἰς τὴν γῆν ἤκουσα φωνὴν λέγουσαν πρός με τῇ Ἑβραΐδι διαλέκτῳ· Σαοὺλ Σαούλ, τί με διώκεις; σκληρόν σοι πρὸς κέντρα λακτίζειν	παντων δε καταπεσοντων ημων εις την γην ηκουσα φωνην λαλουσαν προς με και λεγουσαν τη εβραιδι διαλεκτω σαουλ σαουλ τι με διωκεις σκληρον σοι προς κεντρα λακτιζειν	παντων δε καταπεσοντων ημων εις την γην ηκουσα φωνην λαλουσαν προς με και λεγουσαν τη εβραιδι διαλεκτω σαουλ σαουλ τι με διωκεις σκληρον σοι προς κεντρα λακτιζειν

Philippians 2:13 (NET)	Philippians 2:13 (KJV)
for the one bringing forth in you both the desire and the effort – for the sake of his good pleasure – is God.	For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
θεὸς γάρ ἐστιν ὁ ἐνεργῶν ἐν ὑμῖν καὶ τὸ θέλειν καὶ τὸ ἐνεργεῖν ὑπὲρ τῆς εὐδοκίας	ο θεος γαρ εστιν ο ενεργων εν υμιν και το θελειν και το ενεργειν υπερ της ευδοκιας	ο θεος γαρ εστιν ο ενεργων εν υμιν και το θελειν και το ενεργειν υπερ της ευδοκιας

Hebrews 12:2 (NET)	Hebrews 12:2 (KJV)
keeping our eyes fixed on Jesus, the pioneer and perfecter of our faith. For the joy set out for him he endured the cross, disregarding its shame, and has taken his seat at the right hand of the throne of God.	Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
ἀφορῶντες εἰς τὸν τῆς πίστεως ἀρχηγὸν καὶ τελειωτὴν Ἰησοῦν, ὃς ἀντὶ τῆς προκειμένης αὐτῷ χαρᾶς ὑπέμεινεν σταυρὸν αἰσχύνης καταφρονήσας ἐν δεξιᾷ τε τοῦ θρόνου τοῦ θεοῦ κεκάθικεν	αφορωντες εις τον της πιστεως αρχηγον και τελειωτην ιησουν ος αντι της προκειμενης αυτω χαρας υπεμεινεν σταυρον αισχυνης καταφρονησας εν δεξια τε του θρονου του θεου εκαθισεν	αφορωντες εις τον της πιστεως αρχηγον και τελειωτην ιησουν ος αντι της προκειμενης αυτω χαρας υπεμεινεν σταυρον αισχυνης καταφρονησας εν δεξια τε του θρονου του θεου κεκαθικεν

Father, Forgive Them – Part 6

Back to Romans, Part 91

Back to To Make Holy, Part 6

Back to Is Sin Less Than Sin? Part 2

Back to Hannah’s Prayer, Part 2

Back to A Door of Hope, Part 1

Back to Fear – Deuteronomy, Part 14

Back to Saul and Barnabas, Part 3

Back to Paul’s OT Quotes – Romans 10:18-21

Back to Jedidiah, Part 5

Back to Hannah’s Prayer, Part 6

Back to Peter’s First Gospel Proclamation Revisited, Part 3

Back to Romans, Part 8

Back to Psalm 22, Part 4

Back to Patterns of Evidence: Exodus

Back to Romans, Part 12

Back to Who Am I? Part 12

Back to Psalm 22, Part 8

Back to Peter’s Second Gospel Proclamation, Part 1

Back to Romans, Part 18

Back to Funeral, Part 2

Back to Westworld, Part 1

Back to Westworld, Part 3

Back to Westworld, Part 4

Back to The Book of Life, Part 1

Back to Christianity, Part 1

Back to Christianity, Part 2

Back to Christianity, Part 5

Back to Who Am I? Part 14

Back to Keep Yourselves from Idols, Part 1

Back to Who Am I? Part 17

^[1] Hebrews 1:13b (NET)

^[2] Romans 5:10 (NET)

^[3] Revelation 19:15b (NASB) Table

^[4] The Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had the article ο preceding Lord. The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ did not.

^[5] The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had ὑποκάτω here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had υποποδιον (KJV: footstool).

^[6] The Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had had the article ο preceding Lord. The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ did not.

^[7] The NET parallel Greek text, NA²⁸ and Stephanus Textus Receptus had εἶπεν here, where the Byzantine Majority Text had λεγει.

^[8] The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had ὑποκάτω here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had υποποδιον (KJV: footstool).

^[9] The Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had the article ο here. The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ did not.

^[10] The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had οὗτος here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had αυτος (KJV: this man).

^[11] The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had ἄχρι here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had αχρις (KJV: till).

^[12] The Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had the particle αν preceding has put. The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ did not.

^[13] Hebrews 2:8a (NET)

^[14] In the NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ Mary was spelled Μαριὰμ, and μαρια in the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text.

^[15] John 11:2a (NET)

^[16] The NET parallel Greek text, NA²⁸ and Byzantine Majority Text had καὶ preceding learned. The Stephanus Textus Receptus did not.

^[17] The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had κατάκειται here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had ανακειται (KJV: sat at meat).

^[18] Luke 7:37 (NET)

^[19] Luke 7:38b (NET)

^[20] The Stephanus Textus Receptus had the article του (KJV: of) here. The NET parallel Greek text, NA²⁸ and Byzantine Majority Text did not.

^[21] The Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had ουν (KJV: therefore) following Everyone. The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ did not.

^[22] The NET parallel Greek text, NA²⁸ and Stephanus Textus Receptus had ἀκούσας here, where the Byzantine Majority Text had ακουων.

^[23] John 6:44a, 45 (NET) The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had ἐμέ here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had με.

^[24] The NET parallel Greek text, NA²⁸ and Byzantine Majority Text had τί here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus had οτι (KJV: Because).

^[25] Matthew 7:14 (NET)

^[26] In the NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ Mary was spelled Μαριάμ, and μαρια in the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text.

^[27] The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had παρακαθεσθεῖσα here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had παρακαθισασα.

^[28] The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had πρὸς here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had παρα.

^[29] The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had κυρίου here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had ιησου.

^[30] Luke 10:39b (NET)

^[31] In the NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ Mary was spelled Μαριάμ, and μαρια in the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text.

^[32] John 12:3a (NET)

^[33] The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had the article τὸ preceding formerly, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had τον.

^[34] The NET parallel Greek text and Byzantine Majority Text had ἀλλὰ here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and NA²⁸ had αλλ.

^[35] 1 Timothy 1:13 (NET)

^[36] Luke 23:34a (NET) Table

^[37] Acts 26:14b (NET)

^[38] John 12:32 (NET)

^[39] Philippians 2:13 (NET) The Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had the article ο preceding God. The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ did not.

^[40] Romans 9:16 (NET) Table

^[41] The NET parallel Greek text, NA²⁸ and Byzantine Majority Text had κεκάθικεν here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus had εκαθισεν (KJV: is set down).

Son of God – John, Part 4

Posted on March 1, 2013 by admin

This is round three of my attempt to determine whether that the light has come into the world and people loved the darkness rather than the light^[1] is the judgment/condemnation God did not send his Son into the world to do^[2] and has been done already to the one who does not believe,^[3] or the basis for judging,^[4] and the rationale or justification for condemning one to burn in hell for all eternity. First, that the light has come into the world and people loved the darkness rather than the light could be a judgment. (“Oh, you lover of darkness” is admittedly a bit weak as condemnation.) But loving darkness rather than light is merely a preference, and cannot be a basis for judging apart from the reality that preference indicates: because their deeds were evil.^[5] In other words evil deeds supply the power that justifies making a preference for darkness a basis for judging, and then condemning someone to hell.

I never thought to question the translation of πονηρὰ (a form of πονηρός)^[6] as evil until I read the definitions in the NET online Bible: “1) full of labours, annoyances, hardships 1a) pressed and harassed by labours 1b) bringing toils, annoyances, perils; of a time full of peril to Christian faith and steadfastness; causing pain and trouble 2) bad, of a bad nature or condition 2a) in a physical sense: diseased or blind 2b) in an ethical sense: evil wicked, bad.” But was Jesus speaking ethically as a moral philosopher? It seems to me that I would have related to Him a whole lot sooner if that were the case. I loved Socrates.

But before I substitute any other definitions I should point out that the NET translation is not alone in translating πονηρὰ evil. The NAS and KJV use the word evil, too. That is getting very close to the beginning of translating the New Testament into the English language. This is a long tradition. Perhaps the translators of the NAS and KJV didn’t know all the meanings for πονηρὰ that the translators of the NET had at their disposal. So I’ll begin with the more limited definition from Strong’s Concordance: “hurtful, that is, evil (properly in effect or influence, and thus differing from G2556, which refers rather to essential character…).”

Now this is the basis for judging: that the light has come into the world and people loved the darkness rather than the light, because their deeds were [hurtful].^[7] Obviously, hurtful lacks the justificatory power of evil (e.g., the power to justify judging and condemning someone to hell), but it does sound like Jesus.

Saul, Saul, Jesus said, why are you persecuting me? You are hurting yourself by kicking against the goads.^[8] The implication here was that Jesus had already reached out to Saul in other more subtle ways. But Saul’s faith in his religion was so strong that it took nothing less than a personal appearance in all his glory (which Saul perceived as a blinding light and a voice) to persuade Saul to hear. Jesus did not say, “Saul, Saul, you evil sinner, why are you arresting my followers and condemning them to death?” His concern was that Saul’s persistent and stubborn resistance to the insistent and stubborn call of God was hard on Saul.

So I said, Paul (Saul) continued, “Who are you, Lord?” And the Lord replied, “I am Jesus whom you are persecuting. But get up and stand on your feet, for I have appeared to you for this reason, to designate you in advance as a servant and witness to the things you have seen and to the things in which I will appear to you. I will rescue you from your own people and from the Gentiles, to whom I am sending you to open their eyes so that they turn from darkness (σκότους)^[9] to light (φῶς)^[10] and from the power of Satan to God, so that they may receive forgiveness of sins and a share among those who are sanctified by faith in me.”^[11]

So rather than standing back in ethical detachment as a moral philosopher, using people’s preference for darkness as a basis for judging and then condemning them to hell, this sounds as if Jesus sent Saul (Paul) to open their eyes so that they turn from darkness (σκότους) to light (φῶς) and from the power of Satan to God, so that they may receive forgiveness of sins and a share among those who are sanctified by faith in [Jesus]. In this light then, that the light (φῶς) has come into the world and people loved the darkness (σκότος) rather than the light (φῶς) sounds more like a judgment than a basis for judging. And this judgment prompted at least two action items on the divine to-do list. It is the reason God sent his Son into the world, that the world should be saved through him, and the reason Jesus, the Son, sent Saul to open [Gentile’s] eyes.

To be fair to the NET translators, they didn’t think Jesus was speaking in John 3:19. Perhaps John was speaking ethically as a moral philosopher. So I turned to another instance of πονηρὰ translated evil in John’s Gospel. The world cannot hate you, Jesus told his half brothers, but it hates me, because I am testifying (μαρτυρῶ, a form of μαρτυρέω)^[12] about it that its deeds are evil (πονηρά).^[13] Again evil is used in all three translations, KJV, NAS and NET.

	KJV	NAS	NET
7:7	The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil.	“The world cannot hate you, but it hates Me because I testify of it, that its deeds are evil.”	“The world cannot hate you, but it hates me, because I am testifying about it that its deeds are evil.”

If Jesus had been traveling around Judea “testifying” that people’s deeds were evil, it would seem a little bit like what God did not send his Son into the world to do (that is, judge or condemn the world). But Jesus had also said, If I testify (μαρτυρῶ) about myself, my testimony is not true,^[14] and, the deeds that the Father has assigned me to complete – the deeds I am now doing – testify (μαρτυρεῖ, another form of μαρτυρέω) about me that the Father has sent me.^[15] It isn’t hard for me to imagine that Jesus’ righteousness testified to those around Him that their deeds didn’t measure up. But here I picked up the scent. It will be harder to throw me off the trail.

The word evil conjures an image of sin and sinners, violations of God’s holy law. But that doesn’t square with the Gospel narratives at all. It wasn’t an angry mob of prostitutes and tax collectors that led Jesus to Golgotha. It was a mob of religious people, indignant because his deeds of righteousness testified that their religious deeds were hurtful (as opposed to evil). Their religion kept them from coming to Him. He was ready to forgive their sin, their evil, but their faith in their religion and their own “righteous” deeds were the hurtful deeds that caused them so much harm.

I feel more confident now to substitute what the NET translators considered the first definition of πονηρὰ (a form of πονηρός): Now this is the [judgment]: that the light has come into the world and people loved the darkness rather than the light, because their deeds were [full of labours, annoyances, and hardships].^[16] This definitely sounds like Jesus. Come to me, He said, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke on you and learn from me, because I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy to bear, and my load is not hard to carry.^[17]

If I continue in this vein, rejecting the ethical definition of φαῦλα (a form of φαῦλος),^[18] I get, For everyone who does [ordinary or worthless] deeds hates the light and does not come to the light, so that their deeds will not be exposed [e.g., as ordinary or worthless]. But the one who practices the truth comes to the light, so that it may be plainly evident that his deeds have been done in God.^[19]

While in is a perfectly acceptable translation of ἐν,^[20] the NET translators used with 145 times and by 135 times in other places in the New Testament. But the one who practices the truth comes to the light, so that it may be plainly evident that his deeds have been done [by] God, would have further highlighted the contrast between righteousness and ordinary or worthless religious works done in one’s own strength.

It seems to me now that the translation of πονηρά as evil in these two instances was at best the work of moral philosophers recasting Jesus in their own image. At worst it was the religious mind reasserting itself while attempting to remain in the shadows by focusing the light away from itself and on to the evil. But Jesus said to them, “I tell you the truth, tax collectors and prostitutes will go ahead of you into the kingdom of God!”^[21]

Son of God – John, Part 5

Back to Antichrist – Part 3

Back to Son of God – 1 John, Part 1

Back to Fear – Exodus, Part 9

Back to Torture, Part 1

Back to Romans, Part 51

Back to My Reasons and My Reason, Part 6

Back to Romans, Part 79

Back to Who Am I? Part 5

Back to To Make Holy, Part 1

Back to Who Am I? Part 6

Back to My Deeds, Part 2

Back to My Deeds, Part 3

^[1] John 3:19 (NET)

^[2] John 3:17 (NET)

^[3] John 3:18 (NET)

^[4] John 3:19 (NET)

^[5] John 3:19b (NET)

^[7] John 3:19 (NET)

^[8] Acts 26:14b (NET)

^[11] Acts 26:15-18 (NET)

^[13] John 7:7 (NET)

^[14] John 5:31 (NET)

^[15] John 5:36b (NET)

^[16] John 3:19 (NET)

^[17] Matthew 11:28-30 (NET)

^[19] John 3:20, 21 (NET)

^[21] Matthew 21:31b (NET) Table

Romans, Part 8

Posted on August 6, 2012 by admin

Paul continued writing to those who do not know that God’s kindness leads you to repentance (μετάνοιαν, a form of μετάνοια).¹ But because of your stubbornness (σκληρότητα, a form of σκληρότης) and your unrepentant (ἀμετανόητον, a form of ἀμετανόητος) heart, you are storing up wrath (ὀργὴν, a form of ὀργή) for yourselves in the day of wrath (ὀργῆς, another form of ὀργή), when God’s righteous judgment (δικαιοκρισίας, a form of δικαιοκρισία) is revealed (ἀποκαλύψεως, a form of ἀποκάλυψις)!²

The Greek word σκληρότητα (a form of σκληρότης) is only used this once in the New Testament, but it comes from the word σκληρός (dry, hard, tough). In “The Parable of the Talents” (Matthew 25:14-30) the evil and lazy slave³ described his master as a hard (σκληρός) man, harvesting where you did not sow, and gathering where you did not scatter seed.⁴

Jesus said, I tell you the solemn truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in yourselves. The one who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I⁵ will raise him up on⁶ the last day. For my flesh is true⁷ food, and my blood is true drink. The one who eats my flesh and drinks my blood resides in me, and I in him.⁸ His own disciples responded, This is a difficult (σκληρός) saying! Who can understand it?⁹ Jesus’ explanation is right on target for the study of Paul’s letter to the Romans, The Spirit is the one who gives life; human nature is of no help! The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and are life.¹⁰

Paul, recounting his own experience resisting repentance, told King Agrippa what Jesus had said to him on the Damascus road: When we had all fallen to the ground, I heard a voice saying to me¹¹ in Aramaic, “Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me? You are hurting (σκληρός) yourself by kicking against the goads.”¹²

James wrote about harsh (σκληρῶν, a form of σκληρός) winds,¹³ and Jude about harsh (σκληρῶν, a form of σκληρός) words (Jude 1:14, 15 NET).

Now Enoch, the seventh in descent beginning with Adam, even prophesied of them, saying, “Look! The Lord is coming with thousands and thousands of his holy ones, to execute judgment (κρίσιν, a form of κρίσις) on all, and to convict (ἐλέγξαι, a form of ἐλέγχω) every person¹⁴ of all their thoroughly ungodly (ἀσεβείας, a form of ἀσέβεια) deeds (ἔργων, a form of ἔργον) that they have committed (ἠσέβησαν, a form of ἀσεβέω), and of all the harsh (σκληρῶν, a form of σκληρός) words that ungodly (ἀσεβεῖς, a form of ἀσεβής) sinners (ἁμαρτωλοὶ, a form of ἁμαρτωλός) have spoken against him.”

This day of wrath, when God’s righteous judgment is revealed¹⁵ is the reason Paul said, So then, do not judge (κρίνετε, a form of κρίνω) anything before the time. Wait until the Lord comes. He will bring to light the hidden things of darkness and reveal the motives of hearts. Then each will receive recognition from God.¹⁶

As far as an unrepentant (ἀμετανόητον, a form of ἀμετανόητος) heart is concerned, ἀμετανόητος is probably the negation of μετανοέω, to think differently, reconsider. I’ve already written about the righteous prayer that justified (δεδικαιωμένος, a form of δικαιόω) the tax collector who prayed it, God, be merciful to me, sinner that I am!¹⁷ In the specific context of Paul’s letter to the Romans it is not too difficult for a repentant heart to find itself in the wide net Paul cast in chapter 1:18-32. Anyone can pray, “God be merciful to me. I have been given over to a depraved mind because I did not see fit to acknowledge you.”¹⁸ Or, “God be merciful to me. I have been given over to dishonorable passions because I worshiped and served the creation rather than you.”¹⁹ Or, “God be merciful to me. I have been given over to impurity because I worshiped you as if you were a created thing. I haven’t glorified you or given you thanks.”²⁰

In the context of Romans the real stubbornness (σκληρότητα, a form of σκληρότης) at this point would be to continue to assert one’s own righteousness before God, to persist in the effort to make oneself righteous (whether that be according to his law or on one’s own terms) rather than accept his mercy and grace. It is to this stubborn and unrepentant heart that Paul warns, you are storing up wrath for yourselves in the day of wrath, when God’s righteous judgment is revealed! He will reward each one according to his works (ἔργα, another form of ἔργον):²¹

eternal life to those who by perseverance in good works seek glory and honor and immortality, but wrath and anger to those who live in selfish ambition and do not obey the truth but follow unrighteousness [Table]. There will be affliction and distress on everyone who does evil, on the Jew first and also the Greek, but glory and honor and peace for everyone who does good, for the Jew first and also the Greek. For there is no partiality with God. For all who have sinned apart from the law will also perish apart from the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged (κριθήσονται, another form of κρίνω) by the law.²²

Addendum: July 18, 2020
Tables comparing John 6:54, 55; 6:60; James 3:4 and Jude 1:15 in the NET and KJV follow.

John 6:54, 55 (NET)	John 6:54, 55 (KJV)
The one who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.	Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
ὁ τρώγων μου τὴν σάρκα καὶ πίνων μου τὸ αἷμα ἔχει ζωὴν αἰώνιον, καγὼ ἀναστήσω αὐτὸν τῇ ἐσχάτῃ ἡμέρᾳ	ο τρωγων μου την σαρκα και πινων μου το αιμα εχει ζωην αιωνιον και εγω αναστησω αυτον τη εσχατη ημερα	ο τρωγων μου την σαρκα και πινων μου το αιμα εχει ζωην αιωνιον και εγω αναστησω αυτον εν τη εσχατη ημερα

For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.

For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
ἡ γὰρ σάρξ μου ἀληθής ἐστιν βρῶσις, καὶ τὸ αἷμα μου ἀληθής ἐστιν πόσις	η γαρ σαρξ μου αληθως εστιν βρωσις και το αιμα μου αληθως εστιν ποσις	η γαρ σαρξ μου αληθως εστιν βρωσις και το αιμα μου αληθως εστιν ποσις

John 6:60 (NET)	John 6:60 (KJV)
Then many of his disciples, when they heard these things, said, “This is a difficult saying! Who can understand it?”	Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it?

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
Πολλοὶ οὖν ἀκούσαντες ἐκ τῶν μαθητῶν αὐτοῦ εἶπαν· σκληρός ἐστιν ὁ λόγος οὗτος· τίς δύναται αὐτοῦ ἀκούειν	πολλοι ουν ακουσαντες εκ των μαθητων αυτου ειπον σκληρος εστιν ουτος ο λογος τις δυναται αυτου ακουειν	πολλοι ουν ακουσαντες εκ των μαθητων αυτου ειπον σκληρος εστιν ουτος ο λογος τις δυναται αυτου ακουειν

James 3:4 (NET)	James 3:4 (KJV)
Look at ships too: Though they are so large and driven by harsh winds, they are steered by a tiny rudder wherever the pilot’s inclination directs.	Behold also the ships, which though they be so great, and are driven of fierce winds, yet are they turned about with a very small helm, whithersoever the governor listeth.

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
ἰδοὺ καὶ τὰ πλοῖα τηλικαῦτα ὄντα καὶ ὑπὸ ἀνέμων σκληρῶν ἐλαυνόμενα, μετάγεται ὑπὸ ἐλαχίστου πηδαλίου ὅπου ἡ ὁρμὴ τοῦ εὐθύνοντος βούλεται	ιδου και τα πλοια τηλικαυτα οντα και υπο σκληρων ανεμων ελαυνομενα μεταγεται υπο ελαχιστου πηδαλιου οπου αν η ορμη του ευθυνοντος βουληται	ιδου και τα πλοια τηλικαυτα οντα και υπο σκληρων ανεμων ελαυνομενα μεταγεται υπο ελαχιστου πηδαλιου οπου αν η ορμη του ευθυνοντος βουληται

Jude 1:15 (NET)	Jude 1:15 (KJV)
to execute judgment on all, and to convict every person of all their thoroughly ungodly deeds that they have committed, and of all the harsh words that ungodly sinners have spoken against him.”	To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him.

NET Parallel Greek	Stephanus Textus Receptus	Byzantine Majority Text
ποιῆσαι κρίσιν κατὰ πάντων καὶ ἐλέγξαι \|πᾶσαν ψυχὴν\| περὶ πάντων τῶν ἔργων ἀσεβείας αὐτῶν ὧν ἠσέβησαν καὶ περὶ πάντων τῶν σκληρῶν ὧν ἐλάλησαν κατ᾿ αὐτοῦ ἁμαρτωλοὶ ἀσεβεῖς	ποιησαι κρισιν κατα παντων και εξελεγξαι παντας τους ασεβεις αυτων περι παντων των εργων ασεβειας αυτων ων ησεβησαν και περι παντων των σκληρων ων ελαλησαν κατ αυτου αμαρτωλοι ασεβεις	ποιησαι κρισιν κατα παντων και ελεγξαι παντας τους ασεβεις αυτων περι παντων των εργων ασεβειας αυτων ων ησεβησαν και περι παντων των σκληρων ων ελαλησαν κατ αυτου αμαρτωλοι ασεβεις

Romans, Part 9

Back to Romans, Part 58

Back to Christianity, Part 6

¹ Romans 2:4 (NET)

² Romans 2:5 (NET) Table

³ Matthew 25:26 (NET)

⁴ Matthew 25:24 (NET)

⁵ The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had καγὼ here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had και εγω.

⁶ The Byzantine Majority Text had εν here. The NET parallel Greek text, NA²⁸ and Stephanus Textus Receptus did not.

⁷ The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had ἀληθής here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had αληθως (KJV: indeed).

⁸ John 6:53-56 (NET)

⁹ John 6:60 (NET)

¹⁰ John 6:63 (NET) Table

¹¹ The Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had και λεγουσαν (KJV: and saying) here. The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ did not.

¹² Acts 26:14 (NET) Table

¹³ James 3:4 (NET)

¹⁴ The NET parallel Greek text and NA²⁸ had πᾶσαν ψυχὴν here, where the Stephanus Textus Receptus and Byzantine Majority Text had παντας τους ασεβεις αυτων (KJV: all that are ungodly among them). And I missed it completely. I assumed this was another reference to the day of wrath. Now (Addendum: July 18, 2020) I am more willing to consider this as a reference to a much longer period of time more in keeping with John 16:7-11 and 2 Peter 3:8-13.

¹⁵ Romans 2:5 (NET) Table

¹⁶ 1 Corinthians 4:5 (NET)

¹⁷ Luke 18:13b (NET) Table

¹⁸ Romans 1:28 (NET)

¹⁹ Romans 1:25, 26 (NET)

²⁰ Romans 1:21-24 (NET) Table1 Table2

²¹ Romans 2:5, 6 (NET)

²² Romans 2:7-12 (NET)

The Gospel and the Religious Mind

An attempt to distinguish the mind of Christ from the ordinary religious mind.

Tag Archives: Acts 26:14